Posted on 07/12/2021 2:32:33 AM PDT by RandFan
Anthony Fauci characterized the delta strain of the coronavirus as a "nasty variant" during an interview on Sunday.
Appearing on ABC's "This Week," Fauci said Americans who are not vaccinated against the coronavirus should be concerned about a spike in delta variant cases.
"It's very clear that this is a nasty variant. It has a much greater capacity of transmitting from person to person," Fauci said, adding the vaccines that are being used in America to fight the coronavirus "are working very well" and do protect against the delta variant.
"The bad news is that we have a very nasty variant. The good news is that we have a vaccine that works against it," Fauci said.
The nation's leading infectious diseases expert also voiced concern about what he called a "schism between some states and some areas that have a very low level of vaccination."
President Biden last week renewed a call for all Americans to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, saying his administration is prepared to be more aggressive in fighting vaccine misinformation and eliminating barriers to inoculation for all citizens.
"It’s never been easier, and it’s never been more important," Biden said. "Do it now for yourself and the people you care about, for your neighborhood, for your country. It sounds corny, but it’s a patriotic thing to do."
The Origin and Virulence of the 1918 “Spanish” Influenza Virus
... GIGGLES ...
lol
So...it's a garden variety cold. But the fear mongers are effective. I can hear the muffled screeches of masked up Karen harpies tuning up their annoying choir.
Not necessarily.
The majority of individuals who died during the pandemic succumbed to secondary bacterial pneumonia (Jordan 1927; LeCount 1919; Wolbach 1919), since no antibiotics were available in 1918.
Interesting that most victims of this previous pandemic would have survived had they been treated with (not yet existent) antibiotics. Parallel to today when early treatment with effective remedies to Wuhan is simply forbidden in most places.
The only reason I can imagine for this medical insanity is to further hype the pandemic, exercise control over the citizens, and make a lot of money with "vaccines" for a lot of connected insiders.
Fauci, milking a dead cow for all its worth.
Fauci’s a hammer...and everything looks like a nail.
From the article you posted
Historian John M. Barry, who wrote The Great Influenza, a widely read chronicle of the 1918 pandemic, rejects the view that the two pandemic waves in 1918 were caused by different viruses. Barry was also the first author of a 2008 study of flu patterns in US Army camps in 1918, which suggested that those who were infected in the first wave had protection from both infection and death when the second wave came.
“I think all the evidence, both epidemiologic and now molecular, points to the opposite conclusion of this [Lancet] paper,” Barry told CIRAP News. “I think the evidence strongly suggests the same virus caused the spring and fall 1918 waves. They say the spring wave protected against death but not against infection. That is not correct. We found up to 94% protection against illness—a somewhat higher level of protection against illness than against death.”
Even if it were true that infection in the first wave conferred protection against death but not illness in the second wave, Barry said, “Protection against death is hardly evidence to support an argument that different viruses caused the different waves. That is a very tortured argument. And of course the recent PNAS [Taubenberger] paper found molecular evidence that the same virus caused both waves.”
Barry also took the researchers to task for saying they are unaware of other cases in which circulating fu viruses showed sudden changes in pathogenicity. In the pandemic of 1889-92, he says, the third wave was the most lethal, adding, “Possibly those three waves were caused by different viruses, but we don’t know that. You can’t simply define it away and reject it as a precedent because it doesn’t fit your premise.”
Another case in which a circulating flu virus might have abruptly become more pathogenic was the flu season of 1951, when a seasonal H1N1 virus caused the deadliest influenza year of the 20th century, other than 1918 to 1920, Barry said.
Almost exactly what I thought it should read:
Fauci is a nasty deviant!
When GOF experimentation was banned in the USA, he covertly moved it into a ChiCom lab in Wuhan.
Dr “King of Quacks” Fauci is a LIAR........Period
FULL INTERVIEW - THERE IS NO VARIANT, NOT NOVEL, NO PANDEMIC - DR DAVID MARTIN WITH REINER FUELLER
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIUGg5dXHxiQ/
So, where does one get black market vaccine papers? Asking for a friend!
The only reason the delta variant will be considered more deadly is because when vaxxed people get it, they die like the ferrets did when they were exposed to the wild virus.Never forget, in every animal test of mRNA "vaccines" the test animals DIED when exposed to a new or wild variant of the COVID virus.What a brilliant move.
Create panic over a cold virus, develop a “vaccine” to deal with it, get people through fear porn to beg for something that will kill them when the virus mutates into a less lethal form as viruses always do, and then claim this one mutated into a more deadly one, therefore we need more masks, more lockdowns, more government control as the answer, when it wasn’t the virus that killed them but the “vaccine”.
But the virus will be blamed and the sheeple will believe it.
Never forget, every manufacturer of the mRNA "vaccines" refused to release their products unless and until the were fully immunized against any possibility of being sued for mRNA related deaths or disabilities.
One reason I heard for ignoring the potentially available treatments has to do with the rules the FDA uses to allow emergency authorization of a vaccine.
If a viable treatment exists emergency authorization can not be used, the FDA would have to wait for full approval before widespread distribution of the vaccine.
So, if Ivermectrin, hydroxychloroquine or any other treatment were determined to be effective the vaccines couldn’t be pushed on the population.
Maybe Fauci knows something, because he funded it’s creation?
If a viable treatment exists emergency authorization can not be used, the FDA would have to wait for full approval before widespread distribution of the vaccine.
So, if Ivermectrin, hydroxychloroquine or any other treatment were determined to be effective the vaccines couldn’t be pushed on the population.
Good points. The money motive was very much a consideration when this bio-weapon/virus was constructed, released and spread over the world. Hardly some spontaneous mutation from the Wuhan market, this chimeric organism was carefully crafted over decades in various labs. This becomes clear when one follows the patent applications(see the link in comment #32) .
I hate when an evil scheme succeeds so well.
why does anyone pay any attention to this media hog?
He deserves a serious ass whooping after helping destroy Americas economy.
I think that Fauci is a nasty variant.
GOF studies (now referenced as GOFOC of PPP, i.e. Gain of Function of Concern, of Potential Pandemic Pathogens).
I would have gone with GOFOCURSELF Gain Of Function Of Concern, Universal Risk of Severe Epidemic with Latent Fatalities
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.