Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moderna COVID-19 vaccine prevented 95% of new infections after one dose in study
UPI ^ | 16 June A.D. 2021 | Brian P. Dunleavy

Posted on 06/16/2021 5:08:54 PM PDT by lightman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: Polynikes
The average lay person has no idea what determines true efficacy.

The average lay person understands that if you visit Guinea you'll need the Ebola vaccine along with other shots. They understand why they don't need an Ebola shot otherwise. They can evaluate their own risks of getting and spreading COVID. They need more information, not less. I want to give them all the information. You want to withhold information like vaccine efficacy.

61 posted on 06/18/2021 3:42:37 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
No doubt there were people immune to the virus causing COVID before that virus escaped from the lab. That's not testable though, so an individual won't know until they've had exposure. The other problem is even immune people will get COVID with enough viral exposure.

The German meat plant showed examples of that. Essentially everyone close to the index case superspreader got COVID. Most people were and are not good at spreading. There's no way to know who is and who isn't.

62 posted on 06/18/2021 3:47:07 AM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: palmer
The average person knows quite well re: Ebola. Its highly lethal but we are not talking about Ebola. The present situation revolves on Covid 19 and how it is being marketed.

I want informed consent of the recipient. That is not being done and you know it. The experimental modalities are being pushed on TV and Radio plus being coerced and/or bribed without the patient knowing the ramifications.

I know of at least 4 acquaintances who stated they signed no consent forms and were not counseled prior to injection. That is not good. They were just shuttled through a vax site like cattle

63 posted on 06/18/2021 8:46:16 AM PDT by Polynikes ( Hakkaa paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Well, what we do know is that it’s primarily institutional. The elderly, and especially those in nursing homes, and their care givers, as well as hospitals are the main areas that needed a vax developed.

For most of the rest of the healthy population, the concern realistically isn’t more than we should have over an especially strong flu season.

In other words, a drastic exaggeration and fear mongering. The world destroyed their economic system and really -that wasn’t necessary. In fact the lockdowns, by design were bound to fail.

If you are going to have a quarantine, it can’t be half-baked. Stay home, but it’s ok to go to Walmart - just don’t go to church. That ain’t the way it works.

A true quarantine means no one in or out. The approach that the Front Line Doctors and others took, to treat their patients and reduce hospitalizations turned out to be not only the best ethical choice, but also the most effective way to “flatten the curve”. JMHO. YMMV.


64 posted on 06/18/2021 10:08:35 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Polynikes
I know of at least 4 acquaintances who stated they signed no consent forms and were not counseled prior to injection. That is not good. They were just shuttled through a vax site like cattle

Nobody is counseled. When you sign up you acknowledge reading the fine print (which nobody reads). Then when you get the shot they take your name and other details and hand you a piece of paper with some fluffy info and the VAERS website and hotline. They watch you for 15 minutes (1/2 hour if you have allergies). That's it, nobody says anything. Not sure why you expect anything else.

65 posted on 06/18/2021 8:23:57 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
In other words, a drastic exaggeration and fear mongering. The world destroyed their economic system and really -that wasn’t necessary. In fact the lockdowns, by design were bound to fail.

That's true. But one country that didn't lock down, Sweden. had the same drop in their economy 2nd quarter last year as we did (8% absolute, 32% annualized). Their mortality outcome was just as bad as ours. Sweden did worse in every economic and health measurement than Denmark, Finland, and Norway. In fact 10 times worse than Norway in per capita mortality and economic contraction, Simply put, the people were scared and stayed home and caught it anway.

Yes, you put your finger on it: fear mongering. But lockdowns, while part of the fear mongering elsewhere, were not the deciding factor anywhere. Nor were border controls (see Easten Europe that got pummeled anyway six months later), or universal tracking (anti-privacy). In fact, nothing worked. You simply have to take your medicine: 0.2% of your entire population dies or you get a lot of people vaccinated or a combination.

People might be tempted to point to Taiwan or Vietnam, with almost complete surveillance and tracking in homogenous obedient cultures. But their time is coming too, just more slowly.

66 posted on 06/18/2021 8:34:46 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: palmer
I guess that happens when the manufacturer is immune from prosecution while a experimental substance is used on the general public. That's pathetic and unethical. Once this settles down some folks deserve a Nuremberg 2.0 trial
67 posted on 06/18/2021 9:19:27 PM PDT by Polynikes ( Hakkaa paalle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: palmer

But their time is coming too, just more slowly.
***************************************************************************************
This is a nutshell was the point I was trying to make. Lockdowns inherently get to the same place, and just extend the pain.

And I always thought that some people would choose to self-isolate, so some industries were bound to suffer(no need for government edict).

And I am totally against the Government arbitrarily deciding what is an “essential” business. To the business owner and his employees all businesses are essential. And to the customer, it’s his risk to take.

Nuff said.


68 posted on 06/19/2021 5:32:59 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: palmer

And one more point, while it’s easy to point to statistics and say it wouldn’t make a difference, I doubt that any small business owner whose business wasn’t considered essential would agree-it certainly would have given them a fighting chance, if they weren’t totally shut down.


69 posted on 06/19/2021 8:38:03 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson