-----------------------------Old News-------------------------------
Posted on 06/15/2021 7:38:01 AM PDT by maddog55
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
The more we learn about the COVID-19 vaccines, the worse they look. In a recent interview1 with Alex Pierson (above), Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., dropped a shocking truth bomb that immediately went viral, despite being censored by Google.
It also was featured in a “fact” check by The Poynter Institute’s Politifact,2 which pronounced Bridle’s findings as “false” after interviewing Dr. Drew Weissman,3 a UPenn scientist who is credited with helping to create the technology that enables the COVID mRNA vaccines to work. But, as you can see below, unlike Bridle, Politifact neglected to go beyond interviewing someone with such a huge stake in the vaccine’s success.
(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This was not a bug, it was a feature they carefully cultivated. mRNA technology has been under development for decades. ALL those studies - they knew where it went. This is biowarfare, some of it outsourced or co-opted and developed using tax-payer funds.
I kept saying the technology failed because it never succeeded in producing a vaccine that could be used in people. I was wrong. It was designed to cause harm. It's a planned part of the biowarfare effort China launched with Corona Virus.
First launch a threat and lie about it. The elites couldn't remember to keep their masks on - they knew Covid was a limited threat similar to influenza in most people and that available drugs could treat it well.
Then withhold drugs Ivermectin/HCQ from the vulnerable because drugs work. Use excessive compression in ventilators to damage infected lung tissue. Refuse visits from protective, pro-active relatives. Fold resulting deaths into pneumonia and flu and call them all a plandemic. Insist only a fake PCR 'test' with a 97% false positive rate rule the people.
Next launch toxic 'vaccines'. Deny all known science - insist immunity from prior illnesses is not possible. Insist that immunity following Covid infection doesn't exist and doesn't last. Insist lasting, robust immunity won't protect from variants. Demand subscriptions to regular toxic 'shots'. Offer donuts, prize money, game tickets to lure people to accept a 'vaccine' they don't need from people they don't trust. Prepapre to withhold the right to work, travel etc. via 'vaccine passports'.
This biowarfare attack has been developed and coordinated on an international level for decades.
In a recent interview, Dr. Yeadon (former Pfizer Chief of Science) explains the ways in which we are already safe from re-infection from Covid and all variants we are already safe from re-infection from Covid and all variants. He explains research which shows those who recovered from Sars1 in 2003 were tested again in 2020 and proven to have retained their immunity to SARS1 for 17 years.
Those same people who were tested with SARS1 were then tested with Covid (SARS2). Those people had immunity to SARS2 because they had recovered from SARS1 and there is only a 22% difference, genetically, between those two viruses.
Many of us have been exposed to similar viruses and already have immunity. Those who are most vulnerable and don't have prior immunity can take FDA approved safe medications which cut their risk of hospitalization and death by 85%.
THe gene sequences of Covid variants are less than 1% different from original Covid's gene sequence. Those who recovered from or successfully resisted Covid already have long lasting immunity to all the variants.
The talk of 'variants' is sinister. They have to explain away the harm caused by the 'vaccines' known as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), a well-documented risk of viral vaccines of which the CDC/Fauci were ethically, morally and legally obligated to warn the public about.
The 'vaccines' cause the body to manufacture antibodies. When the 'vaccinated' are then exposed to certain pathogens, the body over-reacts or 'over-heats' causing the person to be come sicker than they would have become if they had never been vaccinated. So there is a documented risk that illness and death will be 'enhanced' by ADE caused by 'vaccines'.
How to hide the deaths from ADE? Claim they are caused by 'break through' cases and 'variants'. People accept this excuse "Hey, a vaccine can't be 100% perfect". Click here to check your understanding of efficacy rates.
The CDC/Fauci machine encourages people to believe that 95% efficacy means that after vaccination, patients only have a 5% risk of 'breakthrough'. This was never true.
According to Pfizer's research trial which lasted only two months, all participants whether vaxxed or not had a less than 1% chance of contracting Covid (participants aged 18 to 55).
After 2 months, 'vaccinated' had a smaller fraction of 1% infection rates than unvaccinated less than 1% rate. See? They compared rates which were less than 1% to begin with. They want to designate seating sections, mask rules, travel rules, employment rules all based on a less than 1% rate of infection disparity among the 'vaxxed' and unvaxxed.
The CDC also conceals the fact that that 'efficacy rate' is only valid for 2 months - forget who gets infected after 2 months. There is concern that the efficacy rates were false to begin with.
The 'vaccine' trials don't have data on how well vaccination cuts death rates, but the safe, effective medication protocols do.
This is the first application of the mRNA platform in humans. Just like the hib vaccine was the first application of conjugate vaccine technology in 1987. The mRNA platform is certainly the latest iteration of technology, but it’s been under development and extensively tested for decades. The reason you’re seeing it now is that it’s just now become economically viable at large scale. In other words, producing 100 million doses no longer costs $100 trillion and no longer takes 10 years to do. But the work has been done at smaller scales for a very long time by a lot of different companies. Most in the medical industry recognize the mRNA platform as being the future of nearly all vaccines and quite a lot of medicines.
Moderna was founded over 10 years ago explicitly and exclusively to bring medicines to market on the mRNA platform. It’s literally the only thing that entire company has done for over 10 years. Pfizer and others have been developing the mRNA platform much longer than that. It’s “new” at this scale. The technology itself isn’t new.
When you say “nano tech techniques”, I’m not sure exactly what you mean. Every vaccine is working with microscopic technology. Whether it’s inactivating a pathogen, creating a conjugate, attaching antigens to a VLP, or anything else that’s done, it’s all microscopic.
-----------------------------Old News-------------------------------
Look at the first line of your chart.
105 - 106 RNA copies /g x 30 g
SHOULD give
3 x 106 - 3 x 107 RNA copies.
But magically your high number kicks the exponent up by one more.
That's also done for the trachea and bronchus/ tonsil and lymph nodes.
I suppose you think that doesn't matter because these values are << than those given for the lungs. But it is putting a thumb on the scale.
You are guessing that the number of RNA copies and the infectious units, attack the lungs in humans at the same rate as the monkeys. Or rather, your source is.
And you are assuming that the ratio of infectious units to RNA copies, is the same for humans as it is for monkeys.
And yet, the maximum number of virions you can come up with, for peak infection, is between 1 billion and 100 billion.
The other thing you're ...glossing over, is that "peak infection" is not the same thing as "all infections".
In many cases, where people get over the coof in a couple days, thinking they had the flu by definition they're not harboring the same number of virions as under "peak infection".
But comparing to the jabs, with the math as given earlier, and 30 micrograms of mRNA, that works out to 1.3x1013 mRNAs from the jab. That's anywhere from 130 to 13,000 TIMES as many as during your handwaving guesstimate of a worst-case "peak infection".
And measurements from Harvard on the blood of those actually injected, work out to about 1 billion spike proteins per millileter of blood. So to get to 100 billion at that rate, you'd need 100 milliliters, or 0.1 liter. Around 3 or 4 ounces of blood.
An adult human has what, 2 gallons of blood? 1 gallon is 128 ounces, 2 gallons is 256 ounces.
So 256/4 = 64 times the amount of blood to get (as many spike proteins from a jab) as (number of coof viruses during "peak infection").
So if there are less than 64 spikes per coof virus, 1 jab is worse than peak infection in terms of raw numbers of spikes (even assuming every rounding error and estimate in your favor).
Come on, man.
Grabbing preprinted info from stock govt resources cannot be expected to be perfect!
Look, a 4-year-old article on Moderna (hence not a reaction to the coof by definition).
You spelled "ineffective OR toxic" wrong.
Red blood cells do not contain ribosomes.
I have an acquaientence on Twitter who did early work in nano particle technology. It is applied to many fields now. I’m not sure he works on medical projects.
I know what has been done with micro circuits and how great that technology is. I have a background in RF and digital techniques for many years. I’m 73 now.
The only exposure to modern medical techniques has been during the past 20 years that I have largely cared for sick and or elderly family members. My 95 year old father died in March. He was diagnosed with Covid19 in December. He tested negative on the quick test and 7 days later we got a phone call from the doctor that his amplified longer term test came back negative. The doctor called in a prescription for Ivermectin 3X per day for 3 days, heavy D-3, Zinc and he was already on an antibiotic. within 3-4 days he did a total turn around. No fever, no congestion, no symptoms in general. He had Pick’s disease for a number of years. It attacked his frontal lobe, we saw it on scans. It affected his motor control, speech, short term memory and balance. Had 24/7 care for 2-3 years. 4 amazing ladies and I saw that he was cared for. In the beginning (9 yrs ago) he could go to the bathroom by himself so I put him to bed each night and he was OK until morning. He was where he wanted to be and where he belonged. He was a very independent person. He was self employed his entire life except for 2 years in the Army in Europe during WWII. (In Patch’s 7th and Patton’s 3rd Armies)
That has nothing directly to do with the Covid vaccines, but it does illustrate there were/are other options that are effective.
Exactly. It makes zero sense.
As he pointed out quite clearly, what is in the article are simply nonsensical statements with no basis in fact. That's not a "view" - it's called factually false nonsense...which seems to be in endless supply. Anyone with basic knowledge of biology, etc. would know that. Waiving around degrees, etc. doesn't make nonsense factual.
Yes, the article says that...among other things. Did the developers say or assume that? Why and how could they possibly assume such a thing about an *injection*? Makes zero sense.
The more I hear about the vaccine the more I fear what’s going to be happening with those who took the vaccine 3+ years from now. I was within a day of taking the vaccine when the blood clot problem was reported and I decided to wait. at this point I will look at taking the vaccine in a year. I suspect I wont be getting vaccinated
Either you are extremely gullible or guilty of the control tactics of the left, which seems more likely.
We can have the lockdowns over without the vaccine. The lock downs are not about our health. they are about control plain and simple.
The lockdowns are the result of man’s decisions, not the inevitable result of no vaccine, that having the vaccine will stop.
They will stop when the overlords want them to stop and not as a result of the “vaccines” effectiveness.
“vaccines” are NOT the answer to ending lockdowns, except for those hell bent on enslaving the US and bringing it down.
There you go making sense again.
As I see it now.
COVIDis not and never was a bioweapon.
It was used and promoted as such to sucker people into willingly take if not outright beg, for the real bioweapon, pawned off on us as the only effective solution for a cold virus that was sensationalized.
As I see it now.
COVIDis not and never was a bioweapon.
It was used and promoted as such to sucker people into willingly take if not outright beg, for the real bioweapon, pawned off on us as the only effective solution for a cold virus that was sensationalized.
That way, they don’t even need to develop any more viruses. Any old cold virus will do when the immune system hyperreacts and kills the self.
Yes - Covid was a crowd control aspect of the biowarfare effort. They had to have something to point to when the actual agent, the ‘vaccines’ was deployed, to blame for the damage caused by vaccines.
Covid was always treatable and similar to flu.
I’m guessing they’re not all wrong and even a large percentage of healthcare workers refuse to take them.
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/304124
https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2021/03/25/health-care-workers-vaccine
Thank you for sharing your personal story and it sounds like your father lived a very long and full life.
Ivermectin has been tried by many doctors, including practicing physicians right here on FR. Experience with it has shown it to be no more or less effective than not using it at all. Some people recover and some do not. There’s no consistency to it. But you’re right that there are other options. So far, the best available option is monoclonal antibody therapy. That’s what President Trump had when he was hospitalized with COVID-19. It’s the best tool available to help turn around patients going down a dark path. It’s consistent, but not perfect. Thankfully it worked wonders for President Trump. As I recall, he called it a “miracle drug”.
I’m all for treatments that are shown to work consistently and I hope more are found quickly. The evidence I’ve seen for Ivermectin has not been consistent or convincing, so I worry that people are given false hope with it. I’m also all for effective prevention. The vaccines can also be a sort of miracle drug, as shown by Israel. Israel has effectively eliminated COVID-19 at this point. They vaccinated most of their population and now they’re averaging about 15 new COVID cases a day and 1 COVID-19 death in the whole country. That’s in a population of over 9 million. All their neighbors are seeing COVID cases and deaths hold steady or rise, but in Israel, all the shops are open and people are back to normal life again. That’s what I would like to see here as well: normal life again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.