Posted on 05/21/2021 6:28:34 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Ask your average American “normie” how many people have reported adverse reactions to the Covid-19 “vaccines” and you’ll get answers likely ranging from hundreds to thousands. Some may be bold enough to claim there have likely been tens of thousands of adverse reactions to the drugs being injected into millions of a Americans. Few giving a serious response would get close to the actual number, which the CDC revealed today.
To date, there have been 227,805 reported adverse reactions following injection of one of the three Covid-19 “vaccines.” Bear in mind, this is data that’s accumulated on a self-reporting basis only. In other words, any Americans who did not know to report their adverse reactions to the VAERS system, which is likely the vast majority, are not included in the number. It’s almost certain the actual number of adverse reactions experienced by “vaccine” recipients is well into the millions.
You won’t hear about that on mainstream media. Neither the White House nor any of the state executive government bodies will ever whisper a word. Even the CDC, which is charged with keeping people informed about such things, reluctantly released the data by burying it on their website with no news release or press conference. They don’t want you to know. They don’t want anyone to know.
(Excerpt) Read more at noqreport.com ...
Cite?
Prior real vaccinations got black-box warnings at 5 deaths reported and pulled from the market at 25.
The coof mRNA jabs are at over 4,000 deaths in the US and over 10,000 in Europe -- even with the CDC slow-walking entering in reporting into VAERS.
Prove that, oh trolling BigPharmaVaxxer Apologist.
Prove that, oh BigPharmaApologist.
I haven't seen or heard a single commercial on TV or radio, or a single popup on the web, or seen anything on Social Media, advertising the possibility of collecting damages if you've been hurt by the jab.
What I have seen was this:
Pure propaganda.
This has been confirmed in mouse experiments, and (sorry can’t find the link at the moment) now in humans.
Cite?
****************************************************
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3961355/posts#1
Even if the true N for Covid is 10x higher the percentage of vaccine adverse affects and the percentage of Covid deaths would be comparable. Adverse effects are still safer than deaths.
The studies done on the medical personnel who were among the earliest vaccinated show vastly decreased viral loads and almost all breakthrough infections were asymptomatic. The probability of a vaccinated person spreading the virus is extremely low. That’s why the CDC has eased mask requirements for vaccinated people. It’s also why case numbers have dropped.
How is COVID different from polio, smallpox and measles? All are viral infections. Smallpox, polio and measles were brought under control via vaccinations. Why would it not be possible to bring COVID under control by vaccination?
I agree. Society did not need to be locked down for this. We also did not lock down society for polio or smallpox. Yet we still developed vaccines for those diseases. Of course most of the danger is for people in certain groups— that’s always the case. Eventually we all will be in one of those groups (unless something else kills us before we get old). Why would you not want to get this under control now?
I don’t give a crap if you get vaccinated or not. I care about people who write and disseminate misleading articles like this one in an attempt to scare people away from being vaccinated. Why do you unvaccinated people worry so much about those who choose to get the vaccine?
I don’t.
I felt some stress myself. Your constant stream of innuendo will cause stress in people getting the vaccine. Perhaps you think you are doing everyone here a favor exposing the dangerous vaccines and the coverup of the data. There is danger in the vaccines. There is a partial coverup, VAERS is at the very least way behind the reports.
But what you are doing is not founded on reason and rationality. Your first incorrect assumption is that everyone is immortal. Thus if there is a death in VAERS, it was cuased by the vaccine. To counter that I simply point out that 0.008 times 125,000,000 / 365 * 7 deaths or 19,178 people are expected to die within a week of taking the vaccine.
Your second incorrect assumption is that every year there are zero heart attacks in the US. There are in fact 800,000 / 330,000,000 / 365 times 250,000,000 shots or 1660 heart attacks on the day of vaccination.
Here's my advice for you: You can acknowledge reality of deaths and heart attacks, incorporate them into your analysis, count the heart attacks in VAERS like I did, show that they are higher than expected (they were), estimate underrreporting based on some sound analysis, and present your results. You can also find the flaws in my numbers or analysis and point those out.
My personal opinion is that I am NOT going to go on that vaccinated treadmill.
In keeping with the Dim's philosophy of self- identification,
I am going to self-identify as "trans-vaccinated " .
That is fallacious on a number of grounds.
First, according to the propagandists (taking your number of 125,000,000 for the moment) a lot of people are already jabbed, so my posting here will not affect their stress on the day of the injection.
Second, my reach on FR is not that great, so the effect on people who never come here, or stay off the COVID threads, is non-existent.
Third, of those on the threads, those who are pushing the jabs the hardest have either already had them, so the objection my first point applies to them, OR, they are mere propagandist trolls and don't CARE what I post. The ones against the jabs, won't be taking them. That leaves only a few undecided.
Fourth, if someone is going to be stressed enough, by my writings on this forum, that the stress of getting a jab will give them a heart attack on their scheduled injection date, they are probably unstable enough that even something as trivial as a dog two blocks away urinating on a fire hydrant, is enough to discomfit them.
Oh, and that also gives the game away, not only that you think the whole thing is about *persusasion* (revealing that you ARE a propagandist and not a disinterested commenter), but that you admit your own side's arguments are completely useless at affecting people -- else they would completely neutralize my supposed heart-attack-inducing comments.
But what you are doing is not founded on reason and rationality. Your first incorrect assumption is that everyone is immortal. Thus if there is a death in VAERS, it was cuased by the vaccine. To counter that I simply point out that 0.008 times 125,000,000 / 365 * 7 deaths or 19,178 people are expected to die within a week of taking the vaccine.
I'm not doing that at all; I am contrasting the behavior of the powers-that-shouldn't-be (Biden as usurper; Faux-Xi as funder of gain-of-research, to name two), concerning the current jabs, as compared to past true vaccines.
If 25 deaths reported to VAERS was enough to pull the Swine Flu vaccine, why is > 4000 in the US (and that undereported due to CDC dragging their feet), and > 10000 in Europe, not enough for even a warning, let alone,"Let's stop talking about mandatory jabs and passports" ?
Your second incorrect assumption is that every year there are zero heart attacks in the US. There are in fact 800,000 / 330,000,000 / 365 times 250,000,000 shots or 1660 heart attacks on the day of vaccination.
Again, you're simply lying about me. I make no assumptions on that at all.
But you are not only lying, you are working with those who are knowingly falsifying the data (even if you're not intelligent enough to know that you're doing it consciously, you are implicitly covering for them).
The numbers of COVID deaths were exaggerated by several means.
1) The misuse of PCR as a diagnostic tool. Kary Mullis, the Nobel-laureate who invented that technique, said it should not be used for diagnostics, but only for multiplying the amount of trace viral materials to the point that one would have samples large enough for lab experiments.
2) The further misuse of PCR by amplifying the number of cycles to 42-45, which virtually guarantees false positives.
3) The expansion of the clinical definition of COVID, to greatly increase the number of reported cases.
4) Together with 3, applying to COVID deaths, the very same false standard you are lying through your teeth about MY doing with respect to VAERS ("post hoc ergo propter hoc") including, not only attributing death while having tested positive for COVID, to having to be FROM COVID, but also reporting deaths 2 weeks later as necessarily due to COVID -- even in the presence of other comorbidities. The CDC recently admitted the real number of COVID deaths was 25% of the actual number. This eliminates both the supposed need for lockdown, AND for the jabs.
Here's my advice for you. Get bent.
It might be you really are, as you claim, an engineer; but there are specialized statistical methodologies for comparing, relative risk reductions due to a vaccine; presumably there are those similarly for drawing out heightened risk due to a jab by comparing to similar jabs, or the use of Bayesian statistics; or the longer, drawn out method of actually investigating the cause of death on a case-by-case basis. I don't hold out much hope for the latter; there are stories on the web of coroners who say "If the death isn't within 24 hours of the jab, I won't put the jab on the death certificate" which by definition may exclude deaths truly from the jab; and reports of board-certified internal medicine doctors, calling to report an adverse reaction to the jab, and either literally being hung up on, or having their report ignored -- when in prior situations they received a callback from the FDA/CDC within 2-4 hours.
But keep flailing, it's amusing.
Top Kek.
There’s a doctor on the faculty of Harvard Med School, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, whom one of his colleagues described as one of the top 3 people in the world on vaccine reactions.
He got thrown OFF the CDC advisory committee, for wanting to continue with the JNJ jabs, and not pause them. Got that?
He says that these jabs should be reserved for the over-70 crowd, since they need them the most, AND that they suffer far fewer coagulopathies from the jabs, than younger people. He says there is no medical reason to give these shots to teenagers.
Quit trolling.
Look, another troll shows up.
Case numbers dropping couldn’t POSSIBLY be because the CDC changed the guidelines for the use of the PCR test, dialing DOWN the the number of cycles to 28, right?
But hey, who’s counting right? 😉
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.