Posted on 04/15/2021 4:34:13 PM PDT by caww
South Dakota governor joins 'The Ingraham Angle' as red state leaders fight back against Biden administration....
Video at link...worthy listen
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
I had my high school graduation at the L.A. County fairgrounds (race track arena) in Pomona California. It is a very large area. the winter national car races were there as well.
She sent it back...last I knew. Besides that has nothing to do with illegals being dumped in our country.
Under this Governor?
Would unrestricted lawfare across the whole state be a good thing?
Again, would unrestricted lawfare across the whole state be a good thing? Any "aggrieved party" could sue anyone for a perceived sleight. Your son got cut from the football team because he's 5'4" and 130lbs? Guess what, if that had been signed into law, guess what, the kid's parents could sue. An obviously masculine-looking student has long hair and claims to be a girl, wants to join the girls' track team but gets denied? His parents can sue.
Nothing good would have come from that, and a whole lot of bad would have been released.
I'll admit, her reasoning when on Tucker's show was pretty bad. She did not get her point across.
Did you read the last paragraph of the bill? It was terrible.
MAGA, look at ancientart’s post, which is the last paragraph of the bill. Unrestricted lawfare, with people able to sue for any perceived sleight.
13-67-5. Cause of Action.
If a student is deprived of an athletic opportunity or if a student suffers direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the violating entity.
If a student is subjected to retaliation or other adverse action, as a result of reporting a violation of this Act to an employee or representative of a school, school district, institution of higher education, athletic association or organization, or to a state or federal governmental entity having oversight authority, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the school, school district, institution of higher education, or athletic association or organization.
If a school, school district, or institution of higher education suffers any direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that school, school district, or institution of higher education has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the governmental entity, licensing or accrediting organization, or athletic association or organization.
A civil action under this section must be initiated within two years from the date the harm occurred.
Any person prevailing on a claim brought under this section is entitled to monetary damages, including for psychological, emotional, and physical harm suffered, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and any other appropriate relief.
bramps, look at ancientart’s post of the last paragraph in the bill. It allows for unrestricted lawfare for any perceived sleight.
13-67-5. Cause of Action.
If a student is deprived of an athletic opportunity or if a student suffers direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the violating entity.
If a student is subjected to retaliation or other adverse action, as a result of reporting a violation of this Act to an employee or representative of a school, school district, institution of higher education, athletic association or organization, or to a state or federal governmental entity having oversight authority, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the school, school district, institution of higher education, or athletic association or organization.
If a school, school district, or institution of higher education suffers any direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that school, school district, or institution of higher education has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the governmental entity, licensing or accrediting organization, or athletic association or organization.
A civil action under this section must be initiated within two years from the date the harm occurred.
Any person prevailing on a claim brought under this section is entitled to monetary damages, including for psychological, emotional, and physical harm suffered, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and any other appropriate relief.
Where do you get this notion of “unrestricted lawfare” from?
Seems to me thst catering to the lefties makes them more emboldened to attempt frivolous lawsuits, not less. At least that’s been my observation over the decades.
+1
That “novel idea” would go along way to solving much of the Leftwing BS we’re suffering.
They’re putting them up in hotels here in Tucson. God Save America!
Regardless of Tucker’s style & manners, Noem wasn’t prepared.
I like Kristi Noem. But she needs to follow through on her promise to arrive at a meaningful outcome — otherwise, she’s gotta notable chink in her armor.
Sounds like you weren't a Clinton supporter.
I’ll spread my skepticism anywhere I wish...I am fed up with so-called conservative “leaders” who cave just when things get tough.
Sorry. I *was* a Noem fan until seeing her do a shuck and jive on Tucker’s show. I don’t respect that.
Regarding your comment. I’m not entirely sure of your meaning. Could you please clarify for me?
Unrestricted lawfare.
13-67-5. Cause of Action.
If a student is deprived of an athletic opportunity or if a student suffers direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the violating entity.
If a student is subjected to retaliation or other adverse action, as a result of reporting a violation of this Act to an employee or representative of a school, school district, institution of higher education, athletic association or organization, or to a state or federal governmental entity having oversight authority, that student has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the school, school district, institution of higher education, or athletic association or organization.
If a school, school district, or institution of higher education suffers any direct or indirect harm, as a result of this Act being violated, that school, school district, or institution of higher education has a private cause of action for injunctive relief, damages, and any other relief available under law, against the governmental entity, licensing or accrediting organization, or athletic association or organization.
A civil action under this section must be initiated within two years from the date the harm occurred.
Any person prevailing on a claim brought under this section is entitled to monetary damages, including for psychological, emotional, and physical harm suffered, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, and any other appropriate relief.
I see you’re assigning terms now.
Things like this come about from not fighting back, rather than backing down. And backing down even now will cause this to proliferate instead of going away; look at how many mindless folk said that giving the 2020 election to the Dems would make the riots stop . . .
I don’t know what to say then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.