Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
Nope. You fall on one issue and that’s a slippery slope.

Again, would unrestricted lawfare across the whole state be a good thing? Any "aggrieved party" could sue anyone for a perceived sleight. Your son got cut from the football team because he's 5'4" and 130lbs? Guess what, if that had been signed into law, guess what, the kid's parents could sue. An obviously masculine-looking student has long hair and claims to be a girl, wants to join the girls' track team but gets denied? His parents can sue.

Nothing good would have come from that, and a whole lot of bad would have been released.

65 posted on 04/15/2021 7:20:16 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: wastedyears

Where do you get this notion of “unrestricted lawfare” from?

Seems to me thst catering to the lefties makes them more emboldened to attempt frivolous lawsuits, not less. At least that’s been my observation over the decades.


70 posted on 04/15/2021 7:37:25 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson