Skip to comments.
US Supreme Court: Gun Licensing Fees Are Unconstitutional
American Thinker ^
| 4/12/21
| Civis Americanus
Posted on 04/12/2021 9:08:03 AM PDT by skimbell
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: skimbell
This might encourage some States to go with Constitutional Carry.
Possible push States that have considered it before at least.
To: Sgt_Schultze
The slippery slope of gay marriage - that ‘moderate Republicans promised was a fallacy - turns out to be slipperier than initially feared.
22
posted on
04/12/2021 9:51:44 AM PDT
by
ScubaDiver
(Reddit refugee.)
To: skimbell
Everything is up to the states from now on. Who gives a crap what the supreme kangaroo court says.
To: skimbell
24
posted on
04/12/2021 9:53:34 AM PDT
by
HKMk23
(INADEQUACY: If this keeps up, we may not be able to let you help us anymore.)
To: skimbell
a right granted by the Federal Constitution.Did they really say this? Because the 'Federal Constitution' does not 'grant' anything.
25
posted on
04/12/2021 9:53:41 AM PDT
by
real saxophonist
(Yeah, well, y'know that's just like, uhh... your opinion, man)
To: Alas Babylon!
Yeah, do go showing off and reading cursive or anything. That’d be for white peoples.
26
posted on
04/12/2021 9:56:24 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Arm Up! They Have!)
To: usconservative
Filthynois...license (FOID) needed to purchase, possess or even handle firearms and ammunition. Needed BEFORE even applying for concealed carry!
27
posted on
04/12/2021 9:59:09 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: skimbell
Just give him time. He will find a way to bow to his handlers whoever they are.
28
posted on
04/12/2021 10:01:31 AM PDT
by
Sequoyah101
(Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
To: skimbell
So the lic to own a machine gun is gone
29
posted on
04/12/2021 10:11:18 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God")
To: skimbell
If the SCOTUS does not protect the olbillorights then, we have to do it with our guns or die trying.
Hell yeah, the tyrants want our guns!
It becomes us or them.
That is war.
30
posted on
04/12/2021 10:19:22 AM PDT
by
right way right
(May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope. )
To: skimbell
![](https://web.archive.org/web/20140223105426/http://www.collectoons.com/imgtoon/701/702/20100101_121507chode.gif)
but there will still be an $XXX clerical handling fee to process the paperwork for your "FREE" license to exercise the right you were given by God...
31
posted on
04/12/2021 10:21:52 AM PDT
by
Chode
(there is no fall back position, there is no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. P144:1)
To: real saxophonist; dayglored; Nathan _in_Arkansas
I noticed the “grant” issue as well, but in reading the article I believe that the author used “grant” in the context of the SC was “in agreement with”.
Could be wrong but the author also refers to “...this fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution...”
32
posted on
04/12/2021 10:28:26 AM PDT
by
skimbell
To: skimbell
Any word yet on if Amendments to the US Constitution is really suggestions that can be abolished by Executive Order?
To: Fester Chugabrew
>>Easy. He’ll call it a “tax.”<<
I just read the article (I going weird sometimes). The ruling specifically is based on taxes.
It is just unexpected SCOTUS should rule pro-freedom with that turncoat commie Roberts at the helm.
34
posted on
04/12/2021 11:38:27 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(No matter what, resist and stop the agenda of blow bidet and hairass the whore)
To: I got the rope
>>Like a poll tax?<<
Read the article. Poll tax is specifically referenced.
35
posted on
04/12/2021 11:39:13 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(No matter what, resist and stop the agenda of blow bidet and hairass the whore)
To: dayglored
>>The Federal Constitution DOES NOT GRANT RIGHTS, IT GUARANTEES THE RIGHTS GIVEN TO MAN BY GOD.<<
It instantiates a specific set of rights and uses God as the framework.
There is no legal construct of “natural rights.” That is up there with “driving” vs. “travelling.”
36
posted on
04/12/2021 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(No matter what, resist and stop the agenda of blow bidet and hairass the whore)
To: skimbell
Hi.
I gotta idea. Charge Nanzi Pelosi for every word she speaks and writes.
5.56mm
37
posted on
04/12/2021 11:42:15 AM PDT
by
M Kehoe
(Quid Pro Joe and the Ho ain't my president.)
To: Bonemaker
Yup, the thieving bastards get us twice that way. I had to pay for both.
BTW I am so stealing Filthynois. Gawd that’s great!
38
posted on
04/12/2021 1:03:18 PM PDT
by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: fwdude
39
posted on
04/12/2021 1:57:50 PM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: skimbell
This was a premise of
US v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) too.
The lower court struck down the entire 1934 National Firearms act as unconstitutional.
Generally, the federal government. courts included, is hostile to the right to keep and bear arms. It is treated as a privilege to be regulated and denied with slim justification.
40
posted on
04/12/2021 2:23:11 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson