Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Rules 7–2, Deals Heavy Blow To Radical Left-wing Environmentalist. ACB authors her first ruling since joining the Court
Populist Press ^ | 03/05/2021

Posted on 03/05/2021 8:29:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Supreme Court Jus­tice Amy Coney Bar­rett authored her first rul­ing since join­ing the Court back in Octo­ber and she deliv­ered a heavy blow to a left-wing envi­ron­men­tal group.

In the 7–2 rul­ing, the jus­tices sided with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser­vice, thwart­ing the Sier­ra Club’s bid to obtain doc­u­ments con­cern­ing a reg­u­la­tion final­ized in 2014 relat­ing to pow­er plants.

“The Free­dom of Infor­ma­tion Act (FOIA) requires that fed­er­al agen­cies make records avail­able to the pub­lic upon request unless those records fall with­in one of nine exemp­tions. Exemp­tion 5 incor­po­rates the priv­i­leges avail­able to Gov­ern­ment agen­cies in civ­il lit­i­ga­tion, such as the delib­er­a­tive process priv­i­lege, attor­ney-client priv­i­lege, and attor­ney work-prod­uct priv­i­lege,” Bar­rett wrote.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amyconeybarrett; barrett; environmentalist; scotus; sierraclub; supremecourt; wildlife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2021 8:29:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

MORE HERE:

https://conservativebrief.com/acb-authors-first-ruling-36255/

“This case concerns the deliberative process privilege, which protects from disclosure documents generated during an agency’s deliberations about a policy, as opposed to documents that embody or explain a policy that the agency adopts,” she continued.

Barrett added: “We must decide whether the privilege protects in-house drafts that proved to be the agencies’ last word about a proposal’s potential threat to endangered species. We hold that it does.”

Barrett and the court’s other five conservative justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the majority, with liberals Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in dissent.


2 posted on 03/05/2021 8:30:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So we aren’t protecting conservatism. We are protecting legal process - e.g. attorneys.


3 posted on 03/05/2021 8:32:21 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

So it seems.

“Government of The Government, By The Government And For The Government”

Our Founding Fathers would be livid with this crap.


4 posted on 03/05/2021 8:36:47 AM PST by Howie66 (God Bless TEXAS! #Texit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Really, all Amy Conehead Barrett did was make it easy for government agencies to conceal their activities. Want to know who ordered the lockdown of Washington DC with tens of thousands of soldiers? None of your business. Want to know internal discussions of Biden’s gun ban? None of your business.

She is a dud, just another government hack, hired because she had the right genitalia.


5 posted on 03/05/2021 8:41:18 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

They’d be stacking bodies.


6 posted on 03/05/2021 8:43:28 AM PST by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

The deliberations of the Fish and Wildlife Service occurred under the Obama Administration. You have to wonder if there would have been a 7-2 majority with respect to decisions made under the Trump Administration, especially with respect to agencies like the Departments of Energy and Education, which were run by Secretaries more loyal to the President than, say, the Departments of Defense and Justice, run by treacherous men like Mattis, Sessions, and Barr.


7 posted on 03/05/2021 8:49:04 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer

What a profile in courage. Writing a decision that was supported by Kagan and Roberts. Give her a Nobel prize.


8 posted on 03/05/2021 8:49:08 AM PST by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

ACB already showed her colors. She has no respect for the constituion or the law.


9 posted on 03/05/2021 8:49:32 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thomas sided with the majority, always like to know his vote:

“Barrett and the court’s other five conservative justices were joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan in the majority, with liberals Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in dissent.”


10 posted on 03/05/2021 8:50:54 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hmm.

A give-government-more-power-to-keep-things-secret decision.

Not that the Sierra Club is an admirable group. They’re not and have done a lot of harm to our country.


11 posted on 03/05/2021 8:52:05 AM PST by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Want to know the name and face of the cop who shot unarmed Ashli Babbett at the capital. Too bad.


12 posted on 03/05/2021 9:01:09 AM PST by thirst4truth (America, What difference does it make?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

FR: now the black pill society. No hope too slight or win so small to escape disdain.


13 posted on 03/05/2021 9:14:01 AM PST by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why post such an addled brain writer?


14 posted on 03/05/2021 9:14:23 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

to update Forrest Gump’s words: “A nomination to the Supreme Court is like a box of chocolates...Except you can’t spit it out if it turns out to be crap.”


15 posted on 03/05/2021 9:14:51 AM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pure click bait lying headline.


16 posted on 03/05/2021 9:15:26 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No.6

We have our own cancel culture. Sad isn’t it.

The Black Pill Society.

I like it!


17 posted on 03/05/2021 9:21:28 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: No.6

Better yet.

The Black Pill Republic.


18 posted on 03/05/2021 9:23:26 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson; SeekAndFind

Not that I disagree with your conclusion, but there is actually a valuable principle and safeguard to protect here. Let’s say President Trump wants to have a conversation with cabinet officials and other members of the Executive branch to consider the best policy. Democrats, being who they are, would love to know every single statement made in such meetings for the sole purpose of attacking Republicans and/or Conservatives. For a similar scenario, imagine what they would do with the details of a private call between the President and, let’s say, the President of Ukraine.

A President has to be able to have candid conversations to arrive at good policy decisions. If the Dems could get every last word said, no one would say anything useful.


19 posted on 03/05/2021 9:23:46 AM PST by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

SCOTUS can kiss it.

The only ruling I care about is the one they WOULD NOT MAKE!


20 posted on 03/05/2021 9:23:59 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson