Posted on 03/03/2021 7:22:54 PM PST by Yo-Yo
If you want to land somewhere with little or no atmosphere, it is the only way to go.
Sometimes not even to the finish line of the first run of the day!!!!
I have seen some SPECTACULAR engine explosions.
Actually, this is the second stage. It would ride up on a super falcon first stage.
I don't remember the red rubber tip but that rubber must be ancient by now. I'm remembering the rockets from the 1950's.
NHRA Top Fuel dragsters and Funny Cars do an engine rebuild after every pass. They only run about 1000 ft. under full power. Some don’t even make it that far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDdo5-f75R0
I assume it is because this thing is intended to land vertically on the Moon or Mars and then take back off when the trip is over. Even on Earth, the vertical landings are much more economical because a rocket that splashes down in the ocean, even if it is a soft landing requires a complete disassembly and cleaning.
No, it’s too big to fit on a super Falcon first stage. SpaceX is building a specialized Starship Booster that is 36’ in diameter that mates with the Starship to boost it. They’ve already got the first SN-1 Booster in the highbay being assembled as I write this. IT will have up to 28 to 36(?) rocket motors to accomplish the heavy lifting.
See #4
:)
They had the thingamajig too close to the doohickey. Or dis too close to dat.
Simple. Just get all of the passengers off before it explodes.
The legs might be suitable for a hardened landing pad
but on open ground probably don’t have enough surface
area to support a ship and the fuel necessary to return
to orbit, plus the clearance necessary to take off.
I would think the landing legs as used on the
current boosters would be more practical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.