btt
This is why our side is losing so badly. An “aversion” to facts? A failure to grasp, state, or adequately consider the facts?
Our side is so clueless. Facts are irrelevant to our CCP ruling class and their apparatchiks.
They will not be shamed or persuaded into considering facts.
They are running circles around us while we get lost in irrelevancies, assuming things which are not true.
Good failure analysis by Brad Slager, explaining the mechanism of the leftist “Ministry of Truth.”
Mr. Slager followed the truth, and spells out the finding of each working part - that the left willingly chooses to ignore.
As always, specially privileged victim group members break the rules and then blame normal people for the consequences.
A spoiled, entitled non-White or “LGBTXYZ” individual can accuse any normal person of anything at all, has power over the normal person, is always considered right and the normal person is always judged wrong without recourse.
Well, it is pretty clear that is why this kind of thing is a favored avenue of attack for Leftists.
Things that are hard to prove "with evidence" and must stand on the assertions of Leftists and other "victims of race hostility" are mighty convenient for them in these assaults.
I started seriously reading news articles and watching news reports when I was 13 or 14 back in the 1960s. There has never been a time in my news-reading/watching life that the NYT and Post didn't conduct media malpractice. The only reason CNN isn't in that group is no one ever heard of Ted Turner in those days, and CNN hadn't yet been invented.
"Workers [at Smith College] joke that they often refuse to challenge the rich students on campus because it will lead to a firing.”In other accounts, I read that the woman mounting the lawsuit is a graduate of the prestigious Smith College, and is also a divorced mother with two children. Her job on staff as a coordinator of student services pays $45,000 per year.
This comparatively low salary just amazed and outraged me. The other workers mentioned in the article, the food service person, the janitor and the security guard, all of whom are middle-aged people, probably receive similarly low salaries, yet all live in an expensive area of Massachusetts.
The woman who is suing has a staff position and is a graduate of this puffed-up school.
The “diversity officer” carpetbaggers who work at universities and other prominent organizations receive salaries of up to $400,000 to stir up racial animosity, such as Michelle Obama, who over a decade ago before becoming FLOTUS, was paid $316,962 to do this “job” at a Chicago hospital. A recent job posting for a Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer at Harvard University suggests a base pay range of $117,000.00/yr - $176,000.00/yr, not counting benefits and bonuses, or hard negotiating by a racialist candidate.
But as for the woman suing because of being labeled “privileged”—this white, Ivy-graduate single mother of two must make ends meet on $45K for three people, including two children who need to be educated, in exchange for working at the insufferably elite Smith College. And all white Smith employees must accept being stereotyped as bigoted, privileged oppressors by racial grievance instructors as the price of keeping their jobs.
I hope she goes all Oberlin College on their asses.