CONSUMED BY HATE: House Democrats Introduce Legislation to Prevent Twice Impeached Presidents from Being Buried in Arlington Cemetery

Gateway Pundit ^ | 02/18/2021 | Jim Hoft

[SeekAndFind]

President Trump at Arlington Cemetery

They are completely unhinged and consumed by hate.

House Democrats introduced legislation on Thursday to prevent twice impeached US Presidents from being buried in Arlington Cemetery.

They called their bill the “No Glory for Hate” bill.

JUST IN: House Dems have introduced a bill to ban “twice impeached presidents” from burial at Arlington National Cemetery and federal funds from going to buildings displaying their names or acknowledging their achievements

This bill is called the “No Glory For Hate Act” pic.twitter.com/o3Y9n7qJUi

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) February 18, 2021

[Bryan24]

Impeachment is the vote in the House. The Impeachment Trial is in the Senate. He was impeached twice. He was acquitted both times.

This is a Bill of Attainder. Unconstitutional.

[CodeToad]

“Doesn’t this constitute a Bill of Attainder?”

Yes.

[Armando Guerra]

Lets get obama twice too

Why stop at twice? Third times the charm.

[Karliner]

cruel dealings

[GreyFriar]

That was my first thought, that it is a Bill of Attainder. And it does meet the definition in the constitution. Thus it will be an unconstitutional piece of legislation.

[Secret Agent Man]

Bill did say she was co president.

[MAGAthon]

meanwhile, lost in the HATE are Trump’s accomplishments and his AMERICA FIRST policies vs. Biden/Harris plans!

[mikey_hates_everything]

If they pass this, he should try to get impeached a third time just to screw up their plan.

[SuperLuminal]

Purge Is The Game Communists Excel At!

While our communist rulers play chess, the serfs play "where's our checks"...

Most of the population does not care how heavy these chains are getting...

[AndyTheBear]

Doesn't this constitute a Bill of Attainder?

Yes it is a de facto Bill of Attainder since it is aimed at one individual. Obviously they are going to try to spin a legal fiction that its not.

[OldGoatCPO]

I believe it does and I believe the courts would rule this to be unconstitutional. I doubt Schumer would even bother with this. Why do they insist on keeping PDJT front and center every news cycle. Smart money would be on trying to get people to forget about Trump to move on. They are not doing that so I have to ask why? Are they stuck on stupid? Are they that obsessed with hating Trump? Or, do they fear him? I tend to go with stuck on stupid and afraid of Trump.

[FredSchwartz]

He was impeached once. I don’t know what the history books will call the second “impeachment”. He wasn’t in office.
Chief Justice of the Supreme court didn’t preside.

[I-ambush]

Impeach FDR for interning Japanese-Americans. Impeach JFK for betraying the Cuban patriots at Bay of Pigs. The list is endless.

[I-ambush]

If an ex-president can be impeached, why not a deceased ex-president?

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Doesn't this constitute a Bill of Attainder?

Yep.

Textbook in fact.

[euram]

I think any president who was unjustly impeached twice and beat it twice, should be entombed right in front of the Speak of the House’s seat as sort of a reminder.

[Carl Vehse]

"... it is a Bill of Attainder. And it does meet the definition in the constitution. Thus it will be an unconstitutional piece of legislation."

In addition to issuing an opinion that pigs can flap their wings and fly, the SCOTUS will opine that the legislation is not unconstitutional.

[Pearfect]

Democrats = hate.

[Lumper20]

Regardless of who says what, I can state that not one
man in my unit who ran TS cross border OPS would not be proud to have Trump visit his grave.

[aquila48]

Which way is the Turdle going to vote?