Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evers set to tax small businesses who got COVID loans
Townhall.com ^ | January 23, 2021 | M.D. Kittle

Posted on 01/23/2021 9:43:16 AM PST by Kaslin

MADISON — Tax and spend Tony does it again — this time looking to tax the small businesses his administration has driven to the brink of extinction with lockdowns and other COVID-19 health edicts. 

Gov. Tony Evers’ Department of Revenue last week quietly issued guidance that ignores federal COVID-19 relief legislation language on tax liability and aims to tax tens of thousands of Wisconsin businesses that received funding through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). 

“Gov. Tony Evers and the DOR are looking to skim the federal money that came down to our small businesses so they can grow the coffers in Madison,” state Sen. Roger Roth (R-Appleton) told Empower Wisconsin in an interview Thursday. 

In a letter to his Senate colleagues, Roth calls for amending Senate Bill 2 (which proposes several changes to existing laws enforced by Revenue) to align Wisconsin’s tax treatment of PPP loans with that of the federal government.

Last year, when Congress passed the bipartisan Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, it intended the PPP to be a forgivable loan program, as long as the money was used to cover payroll, mortgage interest, rent and other business-related expenses for eligible recipients. That means complying businesses don’t have to pay taxes on the money they receive. 

The goal of PPP is to provide businesses with a financial lifeline to keep them operating — and paying their employees — in the COVID-19 pandemic, not to create a tax burden for those receiving the funds. 

But the IRS disagreed, sending out “clarifying guidance” that the loans are considered taxable income. 

Congress fixed that disagreement in passing the latest stimulus last month, making it clear that PPP-paid expenses are not subject to tax liability.

Evers’ Department of Revenue, however, agrees with the IRS’ original interpretation. So, some 90,000 Wisconsin businesses — the vast majority small businesses — face an additional $450 million in taxable liability at the state level. 

How can the Evers’ administration defy the federal tax code on PPP? Because it’s a separate taxing system. Wisconsin does not have to follow federal law. That’s why Roth says it’s critical lawmakers pass an amended bill that would include aligning Wisconsin’s tax codes on PPP with the federal government’s. 

Roth said the businesses were hurt not just by the virus but by the restrictions Evers and local health officers placed on public gatherings and travel. The Evers administration joined local government in capping the number of customers bars, restaurants and many retailers could welcome, and effectively closed taverns for periods of time.

>“These guys played by the rules. These businesses, and most are small businesses — the hair dresser down the street, the local hardware store, bars, restaurants — were forced to upend their business model because Tony Evers told them they had to,”  the senator said. “The federal government did the right thing in the urgency of the moment … Now the state of Wisconsin isn’t allowing them to deduct their expenses.” 

Roth said Evers finds himself further left than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who agreed that small businesses shouldn’t be hit with additional tax liability on the federal loans.

In his letter, the senator notes Tax Day is rapidly approaching and the state Department of Revenue is  “choosing to use these struggling businesses as a way to bolster the general fund to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars in new taxes.”<

No doubt taxing the PPP funds would help sate the tax revenue thirst of Evers and his big government team. 

In a breakdown of the state’s financial picture ahead, the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau notes the Revenue department considers the PPP and EIDL (Economic Injury Disaster Loans) as taxable. “(A)nd our forthcoming revenue forecast will also treat this as taxable.” Making the payments tax deductible would “reduce state revenue by a total of $457 million between 2020-21 and 2023-24, with a larger fiscal effect in the first year and diminishing fiscal effect over the four year period.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: taxes; tonyevers

1 posted on 01/23/2021 9:43:16 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Something doesn't sound right here. The PPP was to shore up small business who were making payments to employees, vendors, landlords -- all regular costs of doing business. Already part of the cost of doing business, which is subtracted from gross revenue to calculate net profit -- and profit is what is being taxed.

So what the Wisconsin is doing is including the PPP loans (if forgiven) as regular income. That's because the PPP program was to help floundering business, not to provide a tax-free profit bump. So any PPP payment over and above payroll &c is rightfully treated as taxable revenue.

Forgetting for the moment the intent of Congress, how is what Evers and the IRS is doing "unfair"?

2 posted on 01/23/2021 10:46:24 AM PST by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair; Kaslin

Forgetting for the moment the intent of Congress, how is what Evers and the IRS is doing “unfair”?


Because, this...

Does a forgiven PPP loan become taxable income?

After the passage of the CRRSAA into law in December 2020, Congress made clear that a forgiven PPP loan is completely tax-exempt and is not taxable income.

As of December 2020, businesses now have the opportunity to take out a PPP loan and obtain the Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERTC) for both 2020 and 2021.

~~~~~

Forgiven, I believe, is the key word...because certain requirement had to have been met, in order for loan to be forgiven.

Read much more, here...

https://www.uschamber.com/co/run/finance/tax-implications-of-paycheck-protection-loans


3 posted on 01/23/2021 10:55:42 AM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s no need to ask Evers’ political affiliation, is there?

Party of the little people and the downtrodden, right?


4 posted on 01/23/2021 11:28:24 AM PST by null and void (My pronoun: "He He", if you don't get the joke, "Hmmm?", if you don't like the joke "Hisss!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IF those LOANS to businesses were used to PAY PAYROLL wages to employees, those payroll wages are being taxes in Wisconsin.This would be double taxation on the same MONEY.

EVERS should be recalled


5 posted on 01/23/2021 11:37:12 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

Because anything not forgiven isn’t a profit, it becomes a loan. It isn’t income.


6 posted on 01/23/2021 11:38:30 AM PST by EBH (Repent, Accept, Proclaim )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

IF you are running a business & YOU BORROW $$$$$ to expand or buy new machinery, etc, that is NOT income.

IF you buy a new car & you have a car loan-—THAT IS NOT INCOME.


7 posted on 01/23/2021 11:39:13 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

See, you problem is that you are using logic and law where liberals are concerned. They only operate at a childish level where emotion and greed rule.


8 posted on 01/23/2021 11:51:51 AM PST by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Wisconsin gets what it pays for.


9 posted on 01/23/2021 11:58:28 AM PST by Ebenezer (Strength and Honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That’s it, put a stake through their fiscal heart.

Die you heathen Capitalists.


10 posted on 01/23/2021 12:10:31 PM PST by DoughtyOne (There is no next time Mitch. Aren't you proud now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BTT


11 posted on 01/23/2021 12:38:07 PM PST by GailA (Constitution vs evil Treasonous political Apparatchiks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
People, People, People.....

Tax law and reality do not have a firm relationship; at best it is a passing acquaintance. While most states have chosen to follow federal rules for the major parts of their state tax calculations, there is no hard and fast rule that forces them to follow it. And all states have some additions and subtractions from the Federal Adjusted Gross Income in order to calculate state tax liabilities.

The big surprise is that Wisconsin is only state currently considering taxing PPP loans. It's amazing that Illinois is not.

12 posted on 01/23/2021 2:54:05 PM PST by Bernard (“When once the guardian angel has taken flight, everything is lost”. – William H. Seward, 1/12/1861)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson