Senator Tim Scott will not oppose certification of Biden’s Electoral College victory

WCBD ^ | 1/5/2021 | Chase Laudenslager

[nwrep]

“Thus far, no justice, judge or fact finder has found evidence indicating the election results in those states should be overturned.”

[RummyChick]

so maybe the rumor about him being against trump was right

[ActresponsiblyinVA]

Has there been a full blown trial on the merits or just a lack of standing?

[BigEdLB]

Another needing to be primaried

[Maudeen]

There is probably more to Tom than meets the eye. . .ya think?

[Boogieman]

Yeah, too bad nobody asked him the obvious follow-up question:

“How many justices or judges have actually given a fair hearing to the evidence?”

[libh8er]

Mitch is likely threatening these senators.

[proust]

Even when he isn’t trying to, Trump flushes them out for all to see.

[billyboy15]

This guy is retiring, right?

Pretty obvious he is securing a position within the Deep State.

[Rennes Templar]

Does anyone know of any judge who has listened to forensic experts testify with evidence under oath in a courtroom?

[nwrep]

Both. In multiple venues.

[nwrep]

Some have. Not all have denied standing.

[OKSooner]

After all the times he’s asked me for money in the last eight weeks.

Choose a side, Senator.

Oops too late...

[DEPcom]

How does PrimaryTimScott.com sound? Looking for URL ideals.. He is up for reelection in two years.

[9YearLurker]

IIRC Scott was on the leaked CCP membership list. (At least as many prominent GOP pols as Dem pols were on it.)

[Shane]

“Who ya gonna believe me, or your lying eyes!” Scott

[DEPcom]

“IIRC Scott was on the leaked CCP membership list. (At least as many prominent GOP pols as Dem pols were on it.)”

Please tell me more, links please. Will use it.

[bray]

How does he know there isn’t enough fraud to overthrow the election. At least listen to the evidence before you decide to stab 75 million Repub voters in the back.