Posted on 01/03/2021 6:57:00 AM PST by TigerLikesRoosterNew
A six-person team that included Rudy Giuliani and Peter Navarro on Saturday briefed hundreds of state lawmakers on evidence of election irregularities.
The Zoom meeting included hundreds of legislators across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Navarro, the White House director of trade and manufacturing policy, said during an appearance on Fox News.
“These legislators, they’re hot, they’re angry, they want action,” Navarro said. “We gave them the receipts. We explained exactly how the Democrat Party, as a matter of strategy, stole this election from Donald J. Trump.”
According to Got Freedom?, a nonprofit election integrity watchdog, the meeting included an address by President Donald Trump. Nearly 300 legislators heard from the president, Navarro, and Trump’s lawyer, Giuliani.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
“We gave them the receipts.”
I’m getting pretty sick of that phrase. Bannon must say it 25 times each show. There are no “receipts”; it’s “proof”.
Bookmark
Maybe it shows how many people are watching War Room Pandemic. I never heard “receipts” used until I started watching that program. Maybe we should be encouraged by the word.
“We have the receipts.”
Steven K. Bannon 😱
Thanks, New. : )
It’s the first time I’ve heard it used and I agree — it’s ridiculous. Use “proof.”
IF that is what he means.
Big step— glad to see it. Timing is important.
Remember, this is a political issue, not a legal or judicial one.
Would these be receipts proving evidence passed on through chain of custody?
To prove a legal chain of custody of physical evidence or witnesses sworn affidavit and to present that custody to a court of law those are needed.?
Ty Galt 💪
There are well over 100 very credible allegations of voter fraud in the six contested states.
If each House Representative presents one allegation, it will take a long time for Congress to be in session beginning Jan 6.
The American public needs to hear the debate on each and every one of the allegations.
The procedure for objections might be cut shorter if the newly-seated members of Congress (including McConnell and Pelosi) that were (re-)elected from the [6 / 37] states that use SmartMatic malware for their voting machines are RECUSED from participating in the Electoral College procedure.
Evidence necessary to justify this action would require a matching of MAC device addresses to the voting machines from packets interacting with the Frankfurt server, which establishes an iNet connection was made to overseas assets. This voids the Federal certification of the machines to be used in Federal elections.
The first question to resolve is whether to isolate the 6 battleground states from the 37 potential states, or not, in terms of recusing their Congressional participation in further election determinations.
Well, I hope so. I remain cautiously optimistic.
But when the Left talks bout 9/11, they say "Some people did something".
So far, GOP action on the election steal is more like "Nobody did anything".
Agreed. No need to use slang in order to make an already too complicated subject more difficult for people to understand.
I think Louie is giving us a hint.
Bongino was the first one that used it that I ever heard.
Proof of purchase, is the way it is usually used. Dan explained the ‘receits’ from a legal proof of real offense.
Recepts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.