Skip to comments.
Anonymous source confirms Swalwell was having sex with Chinese spy Fang Fang
American Thinker ^
| December 19, 2020
| Thomas Lifson
Posted on 12/20/2020 7:45:40 AM PST by PJ-Comix
It may be purely coincidental, but on the same day that House speaker Pelosi and Minority Leader McCarthy received an intelligence briefing on Eric Swalwell's relationship with Chinese spy Fang Fang, two highly regarded conservative journalists report that an anonymous source has confirmed that he was engaged in a sexual relationship with her.
(Excerpt) Read more at admin.americanthinker.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinesespy; ericswalwell; fangfang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: JerseyDvl
No telling what kind of diseases you could pick up from Hunter’s faptop.
Vacuum the keyboard and you could probably collect enough crack for a decent buzz.
41
posted on
12/20/2020 9:09:54 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
To: PJ-Comix
To think, Swalwell is not pissed his girlfriend was sleeping with other Dem politicos.
Be funny if fang fang left behind a STD gift
42
posted on
12/20/2020 9:12:06 AM PST
by
Steven Tyler
(President Elect Steven Tyler)
To: Zhang Fei
“Being gay immediately makes him a presidential contender.”
I wonder how long it will be until ONLY gay men are eligible to sit on federal courts including the supremes.
43
posted on
12/20/2020 9:13:38 AM PST
by
RipSawyer
(I'm all out of sarc tags.)
To: PJ-Comix
44
posted on
12/20/2020 9:15:11 AM PST
by
entropy12
(Those who vote decide nothing, those who count votes decide everything--Joseph Stalin)
To: PJ-Comix
A Fang Fang Bang Bang eh?
45
posted on
12/20/2020 9:20:05 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
To: PJ-Comix
46
posted on
12/20/2020 9:22:38 AM PST
by
Bob434
To: aquila48
Odd that when you do an internet search for her (brittany watts), almost nothing comes up.
47
posted on
12/20/2020 9:22:58 AM PST
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
To: PJ-Comix
I no longer listen to any anonymous source or experts say. No name attributed do not ask me to believe your story.
48
posted on
12/20/2020 9:30:01 AM PST
by
pas
To: PJ-Comix
Somewhere in CCP headquarters, little Missy Bang Bang was heard pleading “I no go back! I no go back! No mo ugry stinky American! I go bweak rock in camp! NO MO!”
49
posted on
12/20/2020 9:38:02 AM PST
by
LittleBillyInfidel
(This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
To: aquila48
Has anyone asked his wife what she thinks of all this?
*******Which one??????
50
posted on
12/20/2020 9:38:56 AM PST
by
DAVEY CROCKETT
(Ec 1:2 The rest is, Vanity of vanities..vanity of vanities!All is vanity.)
To: Travis McGee
Joe doesn’t know many smart guys it turns out. His cabinet choices prove it.
51
posted on
12/20/2020 9:46:27 AM PST
by
JeanLM
(Obama proved melanin is just enough to win elections Trump proves being good is not enough..)
To: RipSawyer
[I wonder how long it will be until ONLY gay men are eligible to sit on federal courts including the supremes.]
Gay men? That’s regressive by current Democrat standards. Gay gender fluid individuals. Collectives? Does it have to be one person? Maybe a grouping whose membership can be refreshed as members die off so the seat can be held for posterity. After all, wasn’t white patriarchy just such a group? The mind boggles at the possibilities.
52
posted on
12/20/2020 9:49:45 AM PST
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: PJ-Comix
We now know that Fang Fang was definitely Fang Bang.
To: Texas Hostage in a Blue State
We now know that Fang Fang was definitely Fang Bang.
Bang Fang
54
posted on
12/20/2020 9:57:54 AM PST
by
AFret.
To: Zhang Fei
“Gay men? That’s regressive by current Democrat standards.”
You’re right of course, I am guilty of making an offhand comment without thinking it through. When we have fifteen supreme court justices there will have to be one of each gender. Maybe there will have to be 69 justices.
55
posted on
12/20/2020 10:04:08 AM PST
by
RipSawyer
(I'm all out of sarc tags.)
To: unread
It goes without saying that Erica Swalwell is a stinking commie lover, but the more interesting question is, why did nasty Nancy pick HIM for the most powerful and coveted committee in the house..??
Because Nancy is probably having sex with Fang Fang as well.
To: PJ-Comix
A Gang Bang with Fang Fang.
57
posted on
12/20/2020 10:07:47 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Texas Hostage in a Blue State
Fang Fang, you shot me down
Fang Fang, I hit the ground
Fang Fang, that awful sound
Fang Fang, my baby shot me down
58
posted on
12/20/2020 10:09:04 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: PJ-Comix
This “Fang Bang” episode should certainly disqualify Swalwell from the Intel committee.
59
posted on
12/20/2020 10:13:36 AM PST
by
DeweyCA
( )
To: PJ-Comix
If whether Swalwell had sex with a communist spy is classified into, then Swalwell should be prosecuted for passing classified info to a communist spy.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson