Posted on 12/18/2020 5:42:23 AM PST by Red Badger
On Thursday, pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood unleashed on Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, calling for his immediate resignation.
"This may be most important tweet of my life," Wood started. "Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are “anti-Trumpers” dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of @realDonaldTrump re-election."
Wood also questioned whether or not Roberts had visited pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's island.
"I have long had questions about “the John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs," he added in another tweet. "I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray."
"Corruption & deceit have reached most powerful office in our country - the Chief Justice of U.S. Supreme Court," Wood continued. "This is a sad day for our country but a day on which we must wake up & face the truth. Roberts is reason that SCOTUS has not acted on election cases. Others involved."
President Trump is even taking notice of Wood's tweets. On Tuesday, the president retweeted a tweet Wood, claiming that Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger would be "going to jail."
"President Trump is a genuinely good man," Wood's tweet read. "He does not really like to fire people. I bet he dislikes putting people in jail, especially “Republicans.” He gave @BrianKempGA & @GaSecofState every chance to get it right. They refused. They will soon be going to jail."
Wood also attached a photoshopped picture of Kemp and Raffensperger wearing pro-China masks.
The president also unleashed a Twitter storm in response to Monday's electoral vote, promising that there is "much more to come."
“Tremendous problems being found with voting machines. They are so far off it is ridiculous,” President Trump tweeted. “This is not what the USA is all about. Law enforcement shielding machines. DO NOT TAMPER, a crime. Much more to come!”
“68% error rate in Michigan Voting Machines. Should be, by law, a tiny percentage of one percent. Did Michigan Secretary of State break the law?” he added in another tweet. “Stay tuned!”
The comments from President Trump were similar to a Twitter storm that he released on Sunday evening.
"Swing States that have found massive VOTER FRAUD, which is all of them, CANNOT LEGALLY CERTIFY these votes as complete & correct without committing a severely punishable crime," President Trump said.
"Everybody knows that dead people, below age people, illegal immigrants, fake signatures, prisoners, and many others voted illegally," he continued. "Also, machine “glitches” (another word for FRAUD), ballot harvesting, non-resident voters, fake ballots, “stuffing the ballot box”, votes for pay, roughed up Republican Poll Watchers, and sometimes even more votes than people voting, took place in Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Pittsburgh, and elsewhere."
"In all Swing State cases, there are far more votes than are necessary to win the State, and the Election itself," President Trump concluded. "Therefore, VOTES CANNOT BE CERTIFIED. THIS ELECTION IS UNDER PROTEST!"
One of the big problems is that voter fraud had gone unpunished for so long there is no fear of retribution.
None of us knows what will happen next.
Maybe Biden is sworn in and we head into a violent civil war, or maybe Trump is sworn in and we head into a violent civil war.
Or maybe Biden is sworn in and the resistance never appears, or is violently crushed.
We just keep praying and preparing.
Regardless of whatever happens or doesn’t happen next month, I know how it all ends. I read the book. Spoiler alert!
God wins....................
Benedict Arnold was a patriot until he wasn’t. Dont defend those who are treasonous, it’s really that simple.
“How many 5-4 decisions do you think Biden’s Scotus Pick will side with conservatives on? Lin Wood is not our friend.”
Okay, Mr. Smart Guy. Run the same stats for the last four years. Roberts went in over 15 years ago. Something changed when Trump arrived.
So, let’s see your data for the last four years.
By the way, Wood may not be your friend, but he is sure our friend (most on this forum).
And it’s looking like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett are made of the same cloth as Roberts.
Entering politics or therapy
Why isn’t Biden given more credit for raising the dead? Might he be Saint Biden?
You raise good points but I respectfully disagree with you. Several of Roberts rulings have been completely “off the wall” and inexplicable, costly and very harmful to many. He was reported to have been on Epsteins plane. There is a question about his children’s legal status.
There’s the recent report on what he screamed to his colleagues about the Texas lawsuit.
To borrow the old adage “where there’s smoke there may be fire”............all these questions need to be answered. Roberts is either a Patriot or he is not. Lin Wood is sacrificing his law career to focus the bright light on Roberts. Good for him.
Insane to call for Roberts to resign until we know who would be nominating his replacement, who could be far worse.
It doesn’t matter as Roberts is a lib and the replacement would be a lib. Thomas and Alito are the only ones with any sense.
Bookmark
Sure. No problem.
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS ALMOST ALWAYS VOTES TO OVERTURN PRECEDENT (for partisan ends)
After Justice Kennedy retired at the end of the 2017 Supreme Court term, observers expected that Chief Justice Roberts would take his place as the Court’s swing justice. While Kennedy had sided with liberal justices in a handful of important 5-4 decisions, the expectation that Roberts would become a swing justice was not confirmed by his subsequent voting behavior. Roberts’s alignment with colleagues in 5-4 decisions during the 2018 term indicates that his was almost never a swing vote, and that his decisions were virtually indistinguishable from those of the other justices considered most conservative. During the 2018 term, Justice Roberts aligned with Justice Kavanaugh in 89% of 5-4 decisions, Justice Alito in 85% of such decisions, and Justice Thomas in 80%. In contrast, he aligned with Justices Ginsburg and Breyer in 15% of 5-4 decisions and with Justices Kagan and Sotomayor in 10% of such decisions. During the 2018 term, Roberts was the pivotal swing vote siding with liberal justices in just two split decisions, two fewer than Justice Gorsuch.
And Lin Wood is still not our friend.
So, please, where do you think the Justice that President Biden replaces Roberts with will fall out in these numbers? Fortunately for the country, it is highly unlikely that Chief Justice Roberts takes Lin Wood's idiotic advice and resigns.
You still believe Biden will be allowed to take office? I dont think so.
“CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS ALMOST ALWAYS VOTES TO OVERTURN PRECEDENT (for partisan ends)”
Good reply. Sorry for the snarky comment.
I’m not suggesting Roberts resign. What I am saying is that he has sided with the liberals in very significant cases during the Trump admin.
The expectation in 2005 by many was that Roberts would be more like Scalia than Ginsburg. So, it is a matter of unmet expectations by many of us. That view is likely due to the recent significant, high profile cases.
Lin Wood is till my friend and here’s hoping that his case gets a timely and fair hearing at SCOTUS. While Wood has made some extraordinary claims that remain to be adjudicated, he has a good track record in major cases over the last 20+ years — beginning with Richard Jewel who was railroaded and ruined by our media and government. There are others. He’s earned my friendship.
And on top of all that, the President gets a briefing by DNI Ratcliff to whom the entire U.S. intel community reports (when loyal to the country).
He knows everything Lin Wood knows...and much, much more.
I hope you area right.
He only bails on the really important votes.
I'm going to speculate that they both are leaders in their specialties of law, and they never expected the level of unlawful behavior by the courts at this level of adjudication.
They are used to defending prominent civil cases in the now-obvious second-class of citizenry. Never in their wildest imaginations would they have assumed that the customary practices that they are masters of would be totally and completely set aside at the Constitutional office-holder level of prosecution of law.
If they appear "unhinged," it is because everything they were taught to believe about law and order is being thrown back at them as not applying to the people involved in this case.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.