Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jroehl

This wasn’t even close... 7-2

possibilities i’m seeing:

1. SCOTUS has more sellouts on it than we thought. (we knew Roberts was dirty)

2. We are already in a state of War with China, and SCOTUS knows this. (ANTIFA/BLM = internal chinese operatives)

3. SCOTUS does not want to set a precedent where states challenge other states outcomes and succeed. (this WAS an unprecedented move!)

4. SCOTUS is overwhelmed by Election cases already, and this was their way of whittling down the workload. (They havn’t thrown out all the cases... just the state vs state case)

5. SCOTUS is under severe death threats if they rule against Biden in any way (related to possibility #2)

Let us NOT jump to conclusions, like the one we jumped to when SCOTUS asked the 4 states to respond. (which they never should have bothered doing!)


815 posted on 12/11/2020 4:47:12 PM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Safrguns
#2 is possible, but Trump has now done the following:

- Given state election officials a chance to do the right thing - and they didn't.
- Given state courts a chance to do the right thing - and they didn't.
- Given state representatives a chance to do the right thing - and they didn't.
- Given the Federal courts a chance to do the right thing - and they didn't.

So at this point, he has several options:

1) Declare martial law based on intelligence information and a China war status (I consider this very unlikely.)

2) Concede and start a daily declassification dump of teh Deep State's crimes all the way back to JFK..

3) Resign immediately, accept a pardon from Pence, and have his jet ready to fly to the Caymans - one step ahead of SDNY.

934 posted on 12/11/2020 4:57:46 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies ]

To: Safrguns

This wasn’t even close... 7-2

possibilities i’m seeing:

1. SCOTUS has more sellouts on it than we thought. (we knew Roberts was dirty)

2. We are already in a state of War with China, and SCOTUS knows this. (ANTIFA/BLM = internal chinese operatives)

3. SCOTUS does not want to set a precedent where states challenge other states outcomes and succeed. (this WAS an unprecedented move!)

4. SCOTUS is overwhelmed by Election cases already, and this was their way of whittling down the workload. (They havn’t thrown out all the cases... just the state vs state case)

5. SCOTUS is under severe death threats if they rule against Biden in any way (related to possibility #2)

Let us NOT jump to conclusions, like the one we jumped to when SCOTUS asked the 4 states to respond. (which they never should have bothered doing!)


Weren’t those 4 states supposed to respond by yesterday or next Thursday?


1,129 posted on 12/11/2020 5:23:26 PM PST by CincyRichieRich (Take back our stolen republic or move to a cattle car of their choosing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 815 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson