Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BRIEF OF STATE OF MISSOURI AND 16 OTHER STATES AS AMICI CURIAEIN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT
SCOTUS ^ | 12/9/2020

Posted on 12/09/2020 12:29:22 PM PST by tarpit

1STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICI“In the context of a Presidential election,”state actions “implicate a uniquely important national interest,” because“the impact of the votes cast in each State is affected by the votes cast for the various candidates in other States.” Anderson v.Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780, 794–95 (1983). “For the President and the Vice President of the United States are the only elected officials who represent all the voters in the Nation.” Id.Amicicuriaeare the States of Missouri,Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi,Montana,Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah,and West Virginia.1Amicihaveseveralimportant interests in this case. First, the States have a strong interest in safeguarding the separation of powers among state actors in the regulation of Presidential elections. The Electors Clause of Article II, § 1 carefully separatespower among state actors, and itassignsa specific functionto the “Legislature thereof” in each State. U.S.CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 4.Our system of federalism relies on separation of powers to preserve liberty at every level of government, and the separation of powers in the ElectorsClause is no exception. The States have a strong interest in preserving the proper roles of state legislatures in the administration of federal elections, and thussafeguarding the individual liberty of their citizens.

(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: scotus; texaslawsuit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: LilFarmer

Great!!


101 posted on 12/09/2020 1:57:38 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

Thank you.


102 posted on 12/09/2020 2:01:13 PM PST by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamo nauseated. Also LGBTQxyz nauseated )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: central_va
From my examination of the economic situation in the 1860s, they would have quickly gained a lot more states if the Northern states had just left them alone.

They would have gotten the five border states and the midwestern states just from economic incentives alone.

103 posted on 12/09/2020 2:02:10 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

His case is exactly the same as the Texas case, but was dismissed for no standing even though he is a GA voter. Supreme Court will likely rule on the Texas case before Wood’s case gets on the docket and they have stronger standing from what I understand.


104 posted on 12/09/2020 2:03:05 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

If the other states “joined” the Texas suit we’d be here til Easter. This shows the strength of support without the delay of actually filing. If there was no time constraint they’d file with Texas.


105 posted on 12/09/2020 2:03:10 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Exactly, there would have to be a motion for every state, then a chance for the defendants to respond. It would take forever lol


106 posted on 12/09/2020 2:04:30 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Not sure, to be honest with you — my knowledge is limited. My guess would be if they wanted to be plaintiffs Texas would have to withdraw, and they’d have to file a new suit together.


107 posted on 12/09/2020 2:05:47 PM PST by AnglePark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

The clever bit about their filing, is that the election of the VICE PRESIDENT is an crucially important matter to the states because the states are represented IN THE SENATE.

The VP is the President of the Senate. If four states engage in illegality to taint the election, it directly impacts the interests of all the states that carried out their elections legally.

It is a very clear, simple argument. If the process of the election in those states is in dispute, there is very clear relief available by directing the states to slate their electors through their legislatures.

If they can’t do that, then the matter is ultimately resolved in the House via 12th Amendment.

It is genius, but more importantly, it is very, very straightforward.


108 posted on 12/09/2020 2:09:46 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BobL
-- Be funny if the AG of Georgia joins the suit. --

Sure would. He can be for corruption and against it at the same time.

Kentucky has a party split between AG and governor, which makes for some interesting friction. AG sues his own governor on COVID tyranny ...

109 posted on 12/09/2020 2:10:08 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

From what I understand it’s because time is short. All these states would have to file to join Texas. This is quicker and allows a powerful signal to be seen in strong support.

Brilliant in a way.


110 posted on 12/09/2020 2:10:09 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer

Awesome. Keep praying!


111 posted on 12/09/2020 2:13:19 PM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; BobL

The GA AG has already weighed in:

“With all due respect, the Texas Attorney General is constitutionally, legally and factually wrong about Georgia,” a spokesperson for Carr said, according to The Dallas Morning News.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/12/texas-tries-hail-mary-to-block-election-outcome/


112 posted on 12/09/2020 2:17:50 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

On War Room, they’re saying the Amicus brief is nothing. The states MUST “intervene” (as Trump is doing) as co-plaintiffs with Texas. Contact your AG office ASAP.


113 posted on 12/09/2020 2:19:21 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: AnglePark

“My guess would be if they wanted to be plaintiffs Texas would have to withdraw, and they’d have to file a new suit together.”

They could each file their own cases or join together to file a second suit that echoes the Texas suit. In that case, SCOTUS would combine them with the Texas suit into a single case. But this is a time-sensitive issue, and that might delay the case to the point where any action might come too late.


114 posted on 12/09/2020 2:23:24 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Interesting. Which lawyers were saying that?


115 posted on 12/09/2020 2:28:12 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

“Which lawyers were saying that?”

The lawyers who work with Bannon and his crew, I assume.


116 posted on 12/09/2020 2:35:11 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

I checked ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS and CNN to see if they were mentioning the Texas and other states lawsuits or mentioning if Trump had joined them.

Nothing, nada, zip-zilch-zero except CNN which has this headline:

“Trump asks Supreme Court to invalidate millions of votes in battleground states”
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/09/politics/trump-supreme-court/index.html

Monumentally yuge story that is ignored by the media. They all should burn in Hell.


117 posted on 12/09/2020 2:38:26 PM PST by Rebelbase (A COVID misanthrope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
said, "Translation please"
17 states and growing plus the president of the US. The line in the sand is being drawn. Think of the Mason–Dixon line being extended in 1860.
The South is rising again this time over state right against an insurrection by China.

In other words. The Supreme court will settle the equal protections under the law there by stopping the Chinese insurrection. The court has no real choice but to stop the color revolution now.
Winning

color revolution is a new caste system based on CIA actions by John Brennon to over turn elections over seas by denying their citizen their right to voice their option and their vote. Caste system means color system.
https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2020/09/what-is-a-color-revolution/ 1860 Dixieland


118 posted on 12/09/2020 2:39:54 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Saw a guy in WalMart yesterday with a Stars and Bars flag on his hat. His phone rang with the ringtone of the car from Dukes of Hazard.


119 posted on 12/09/2020 2:40:16 PM PST by Rebelbase (A COVID misanthrope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

This is not a criminal lawsuit, it is constitutional.


120 posted on 12/09/2020 2:54:21 PM PST by Hypo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson