Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Formally Dockets Texas Election Case Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania And Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States ^ | December 8, 2020

Posted on 12/08/2020 12:40:02 PM PST by Zakeet

Update (1515ET): Just twelve hours after it was filed, the US Supreme Court has officially put Texas's lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the docket, meaning the case will be heard.

Unable to post the image -- you'll have to click the link and see for yourselves.

(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia; US: Michigan; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: dsj03; electioncrime; electionfraud; scotus; supremecourt; texas; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last
To: PA Presbyterian

I heard him say that. Hope he has catsup to eat his words.


141 posted on 12/08/2020 3:32:58 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Did someone really say that?


142 posted on 12/08/2020 3:34:17 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

If I’m reading the entry at the link below correctly, it looks like the Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Complaint is due by 12/10/20 at 3:00 p.m..

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?


143 posted on 12/08/2020 3:37:04 PM PST by AFB-XYZ (Option 1 -- stand up. Option 2 -- bend over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 76Tiger

So what does that mean?


144 posted on 12/08/2020 3:37:10 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Good point.


145 posted on 12/08/2020 3:37:44 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

I hope you’re right.


146 posted on 12/08/2020 3:40:13 PM PST by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: MCEscherHammer
Yes, if the Constitution and the Republic win, it will likely be 5-4 with John Souter Roberts siding with the Leftist 3, and ACB casting the deciding 5th vote...

HOW can ANY of them not vote the same????

147 posted on 12/08/2020 3:40:24 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ
I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?

Well, it certainly can't move forward without responses from the defendants. So this is a good sign.

148 posted on 12/08/2020 3:40:36 PM PST by wittyone (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: qwertyz

THEY IGNORED THE PENNSYLVANIA CASE AND TOOK THE TEXAS ONE!!


149 posted on 12/08/2020 3:42:11 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

NO...they ignored the PENNSYL case and TOOK TEXAS :) This is GOOD


150 posted on 12/08/2020 3:43:15 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: AFB-XYZ
I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?

Yes I think you are reading too much into it. Briefs were requested in the Kelly case too, dismissed today.

151 posted on 12/08/2020 3:50:10 PM PST by hankbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Would the framers accept a foreign power bribing state executives to conduct elections in conflict with the laws passed by the legislature?

I imagine SCOTUS will say no.


152 posted on 12/08/2020 3:53:40 PM PST by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All

Why aren’t there most posts about this.


153 posted on 12/08/2020 3:54:48 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Who will argue this?


154 posted on 12/08/2020 3:57:07 PM PST by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

I think the question answers itself.


155 posted on 12/08/2020 4:04:08 PM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

The problem remains that the GOP is full of squishes and deep staters. This is their easiest chance to be rid of Trump. They plan to see it through. Unfortunately even some who he appointed to the bench will not help him.

I hope to be pleasantly surprised.


156 posted on 12/08/2020 4:19:12 PM PST by Tuxedo (@LOrzech on Parler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

“””I plan to read the pleadings tonight, but does anyone know if the “fractional” voting is touched on?”””


Short answer: NO

The long answer is that the Texas case as have the other cases focused on ‘process crimes’. Namely, the failure of these states to follow their own election rules and make up stuff on the fly. “process crimes’ are much easier to prove.


157 posted on 12/08/2020 4:19:31 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

“”Where did you read the four defendant states have until the 9th to respond?”””


In the lawsuit.

.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf


158 posted on 12/08/2020 4:23:18 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I've been thinking about the timing and strategy of this move by Texas. Here's a hypothetical on how this has been played.

1. The Beginning

A number of States are extremely PO’d within a few days of 11/3 and some number of them are talking amongst themselves. Texas eventually takes a lead for direct action. The earliest actions are deciding what action to take and to build a coalition of states. Confidentiality is key and only reliable states and persons are brought into the group. Notice that this filing to the Supreme Court seems to have caught most by surprise.

2. The Middle

The States laid low to allow the chaos to develop and expand. During the chaos, legal evidence was developed and corrupt players exposed. The majority of Americans are brought on board to believing in the fraud and wanting a fair fix to terminate it.

An outline of the Constitutional infringement by the frauds was identified early on and a draft was started for the filing to the Supreme Court. Specific fraudulent actions and lower court actions/inactions were collected and used to build out the State's filing to the Supreme Court

3. End Game

The constitutional outlines of the violations brought about by the fraud were not in themselves the strongest case the State's could allege. More was wanted.

Over the weeks of back and forth of private and campaign lawsuits, hard evidence was produced and deep state players flushed into the open. Some of the evidence referenced in the State's filing are weeks old and others are a few days old. The evidence presented by the States was curated to be those most effectively and simply used so as to make it both easy to explain and difficult if not impossible to refute. The filing is well written and cited to both existing laws and Supreme Court rulings and how specific actions in the fraud are both illegal and unconstitutional.

Timing on the State's filing was critical. To soon and the strongest case would not be possible and it was essential that the Supreme Court had both Original Jurisdiction and detail that that was so strong as to have the greatest chance of a successful outcome.

It cannot be over emphasized how successfully maintained was the confidentiality of the State's intent and the work product were and using time to their advantage.

Kudos to Texas's and AG Paxton’s leadership.

159 posted on 12/08/2020 4:23:34 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M. Thatcher

“”””I don’t know why people worry about Roberts. He is now a nonentity on the court.

We have a de facto Thomas court.””””


You are correct. And Thomas has very good memories of the ‘high tech’ lynching he was subjected to by Biden in 1991. As we all do.


160 posted on 12/08/2020 4:26:13 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson