Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

If I’m reading the entry at the link below correctly, it looks like the Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Complaint is due by 12/10/20 at 3:00 p.m..

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?


143 posted on 12/08/2020 3:37:04 PM PST by AFB-XYZ (Option 1 -- stand up. Option 2 -- bend over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AFB-XYZ
I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?

Well, it certainly can't move forward without responses from the defendants. So this is a good sign.

148 posted on 12/08/2020 3:40:36 PM PST by wittyone (Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

To: AFB-XYZ
I may be reading too much into it, but since a due date for the Response has been set, wouldn’t that be an indicator that SCOTUS will ultimately hear the case?

Yes I think you are reading too much into it. Briefs were requested in the Kelly case too, dismissed today.

151 posted on 12/08/2020 3:50:10 PM PST by hankbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson