Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Had the Vaccine the Whole Time
New York Magazine ^ | December 7, 2020 | David Wallace-Wells

Posted on 12/08/2020 9:22:49 AM PST by karpov

You may be surprised to learn that of the trio of long-awaited coronavirus vaccines, the most promising, Moderna’s mRNA-1273, which reported a 94.5 percent efficacy rate on November 16, had been designed by January 13. This was just two days after the genetic sequence had been made public in an act of scientific and humanitarian generosity that resulted in China’s Yong-Zhen Zhang’s being temporarily forced out of his lab. In Massachusetts, the Moderna vaccine design took all of one weekend. It was completed before China had even acknowledged that the disease could be transmitted from human to human, more than a week before the first confirmed coronavirus case in the United States. By the time the first American death was announced a month later, the vaccine had already been manufactured and shipped to the National Institutes of Health for the beginning of its Phase I clinical trial. This is — as the country and the world are rightly celebrating — the fastest timeline of development in the history of vaccines. It also means that for the entire span of the pandemic in this country, which has already killed more than 250,000 Americans, we had the tools we needed to prevent it .

To be clear, I don’t want to suggest that Moderna should have been allowed to roll out its vaccine in February or even in May, when interim results from its Phase I trial demonstrated its basic safety. “That would be like saying we put a man on the moon and then asking the very same day, ‘What about going to Mars?’ ” says Nicholas Christakis, who directs Yale’s Human Nature Lab and whose new book, Apollo’s Arrow, sketches the way COVID-19 may shape our near-term future.

(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortedfetalcells; abortionderived; chinavirusvaccine; covid; covidvaccine; deadbabycells; followthemoney; hcqludditeholocaust; hegeliandialectic; hiv; moderna; plandemic; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Amendment10; cabbieguy; Grampa Dave; MGunny; pepsi_junkie

21 posted on 12/08/2020 11:07:40 AM PST by 4Liberty (How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Tested for long term effects and found to not be harmful.

Don’t be silly. That phase (phase 4) of the trials occurs “after market” - meaning they’ll wait until a large number of “volunteers” are vaccinated and then do the long term effect study on those guinea pigs. If it turns out there’s a problem it will be “oops, sorry our bad. Too bad for you we are exempt from liability. Try your luck with VAERS to see if your surviving family members will be consoled with a financial settlement that you most likely won’t get.

22 posted on 12/08/2020 11:22:48 AM PST by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

No. That’s very apples and chickens. The vaccine is to NOT get it. The survival rate is having already failed that step.


23 posted on 12/08/2020 11:24:07 AM PST by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: karpov
To be clear, I don’t want to suggest that Moderna should have been allowed to roll out its vaccine in February or even in May..

According to Florian Krammer, a vaccine scientist at Mount Sinai, you could do all of this at a cost of about $20 million to $30 million per vaccine and, ideally, would do so for between 50 and 100 different viruses — enough, he says, to functionally cover all the phylogenies that could give rise to pandemic strains in the future...

In a just-published paper in Cell, he suggests it isn’t just that Phase I clinical work and the larger, longer Phase II safety trials which could be done preemptively, entirely before the arrival of new pandemics. Some Phase III efficacy testing, he says, could be done then, as well — especially for existing rather than novel strains. “

If we do all that, he says, the entire timeline could be compressed to as few as three months...three months from the design of the Moderna vaccine was April 13. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-design.html

24 posted on 12/08/2020 11:28:29 AM PST by daniel1212 (Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Sounds good, but (the point being) - I’m not interested in taking an experimental drug when the risks are so low to begin with.


25 posted on 12/08/2020 11:32:00 AM PST by 4Liberty (How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
Have you noticed no Dim politicians got it?

Maybe they do and just go underground unreported. Where's Hillary.

26 posted on 12/08/2020 11:42:43 AM PST by jetson (chiwowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

No that wasn’t your point. Your point was comparing apples and chickens to deceive.


27 posted on 12/08/2020 11:43:37 AM PST by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: discostu

You forget that the vaccine GIVES IT to you.


28 posted on 12/08/2020 11:46:25 AM PST by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine

I sure hope you’re kidding.


29 posted on 12/08/2020 11:47:19 AM PST by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

I fully agree. This article is crap.


30 posted on 12/08/2020 11:50:06 AM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Whatever. I’m not getting it, my trust level for government regulatory bureaucracies right now is at zero - and I’m entirely certain about THAT number.


31 posted on 12/08/2020 11:57:41 AM PST by 4Liberty (How does a kids car-donation nonprofit pay for so MANY radio ads if it's a charity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: karpov

HCQ/Zinc Sulfate or Ivermectin have both proven 99.3% effective if taken within 48hours of symptoms....


32 posted on 12/08/2020 12:00:41 PM PST by chopperk (L)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

I don’t care if you get it or not. Just don’t play the “lies, damned lies and statistics” game. Your post was a flat out LIE by comparing unlike statistics as the same concept. I don’t give a crap what you do with your health, but when I catch someone lying I WILL point it out. DON’T LIE.


33 posted on 12/08/2020 12:00:48 PM PST by discostu (Like a dog being shown a card trick )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tiki

No national one. At least to Democrat Arizona legislators got it. But I see what you mean.


34 posted on 12/08/2020 12:07:09 PM PST by Stayingawayfromthedarkside (Look, is it America that I see again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: karpov

If we were actually at WAR with COVID, we would have mass-produced and applied this vaccine as soon as they finished the “safety” trial. We didn’t NEED TO KNOW IT WAS EFFECTIVE. If it was safe, and we were really in a crisis, we should have taken the chance, or at least allowed people to take the chance if they wanted.


35 posted on 12/08/2020 12:22:59 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shethink13

Exactly


36 posted on 12/08/2020 12:25:39 PM PST by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - Dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

Remember how we dropped an atomic bomb in WW2? Way before we had finished testing it, or determined the side effects. IN fact, the 2nd bomb we dropped was much better than the first.

But it was a war, and in a war, you don’t wait for everything to be verified, you use what you got and take risks.

If COVID was really a crisis, we should have treated it that way. But instead, we decided that we should destroy people’s lives, and use normal processes to test our vaccines.


37 posted on 12/08/2020 12:25:44 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

The testing processes for WARP SPEED have been far from normal!

But with all the anti-vaxxers and fearmongers out there, we need to test for safety and efficacy!!!

The vaccine is not the atom bomb, which was made to be lethal and destructive. The vaccine is meant to prevent a disease without causing massive side effects!!!


38 posted on 12/08/2020 1:07:49 PM PST by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
In a just-published paper in Cell, he suggests it isn’t just that Phase I clinical work and the larger, longer Phase II safety trials which could be done preemptively, entirely before the arrival of new pandemics. Some Phase III efficacy testing, he says, could be done then, as well — especially for existing rather than novel strains. “

If we do all that, he says, the entire timeline could be compressed to as few as three months...three months from the design of the Moderna vaccine was April 13. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/12/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-design.html

If I am understanding this plan...

It would be to create vaccines worth potentially billions of dollars for viruses that are not yet a problem, in the chance that one day they might become a problem....Is that correct????

Thank goodness the world is comprised of exactly zero scientists who have a profit motive. That could really be dangerous if there were any.

39 posted on 12/08/2020 1:37:44 PM PST by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: discostu
That’s very apples and chickens. The vaccine is to NOT get it.

What does "NOT get it" mean? Seems like such an imprecise term to use when you yourself are demanding such precision.

40 posted on 12/08/2020 1:41:40 PM PST by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson