Dept of Justice spokesperson: “Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of #electionfraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election.

twitter ^

[Bigtigermike]

“.....That is not what the AP reported nor what the AG states”

The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”

@ Catherine Herridge added: KEY QUOTE @MikeBalsamo1 “U.S. attorneys + FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints + info they’ve received, but ‘to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.’”

[AnthonySoprano]

‘
Don’t watch Lou Dobbs.

Unless you’re ready for the Truth

‘

[KJC1]

Great post!

[timestax]

Here are some of the lying "news media" thugs.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

“””Don’t watch Lou Dobbs.

Unless you’re ready for the Truth”””

---

Amen Brother.

Lou Dobbs is 75 years old and he does not have to kowtow to Rupert Murdoch’s boys or to Paul ‘the rino’ Ryan.

[FreeReign]

In other words the media was lying again.

The AP reported Barr's unfortunate remarks correctly.

[deadrock]

The new quote isn’t much better.

[Fester Chugabrew]

IMO, every precict needs a clear and lawful audit. The stakes are too high.

[Flick Lives]

Why do they have to add “effected a different outcome”? Who knows how much fraud will change an election outcome?

—

This would be the same logic as not prosecuting a bank robber because he failed to crack open the safe and take the cash when he was caught.

[DoughtyOne]

If that is true, that itself is actionable.

Barr better get off his ass and do something or there will be
not Republic left.

Just damn!

[gspurlock]

Thanks! I’ve also been thinking something else lately. I don’t think the sloppy and obvious fraud was because the deep state and cohorts think no one would notice.

I think they’ve long been bought by the CCP. They tried the same tactics in 2016 but the vote for Trump was so overwhelming they couldn’t overcome it. It happened again with a vote so overwhelming that not even all of their combined efforts could overcome it.

Xi gave them a reprieve in 2016 so they could try again in 2020. I think that is why Xi seemed to go along. But after 4 years, I’m quite sure that both China and Iran are close to the brink of collapse.

Meanwhile, failure to deliver twice means that the CCP will take appropriate action against them. I can’t think of anything else that would cause them to be that stupid.

I’m starting to think that Trump’s best action would be to offer to protect them from their foreign overlords in someplace safe like Gitmo, but leave them subject to U.S. law, if they turn state’s evidence and confess to the whole plan and rat out each other. I guarantee that U.S. law is just and the whims of the CCP are not.

This is the inevitable of “selling one’s soul to the devil”. Useful idiots all. But, there is one thing they value more than power and money; that is their own skins. I’m starting to think that is the motivating factor. Most of the never Trumpers and other objectionists are probably in equal danger, in both parties.

[JohnnyP]

Thanks for the link!!

I posted this may be Dobbs’ last show.

[trebb]

Fake news strikes again by claiming they found no evidence.

[one guy in new jersey]

At this point he shouldn’t expect a single word in a transcript to protect his reputation for objectivity in prosecution. Which, FWIW, does appear to be withering on the vine for lack of perpwalks. Also missing are images of the uncovered heads of accused wrongdoers being “gently urged”, shall we say, into the back of squad cars. We wouldn’t want them to bump into the doorframe and get an “owwie”, now would we.