Posted on 11/25/2020 4:24:37 AM PST by RoosterRedux
Pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell said the Trump presidency will be "saved" with a "massive" lawsuit in Georgia she plans to drop by Wednesday. Powell contended Trump was "elected in an absolute landslide nationwide" in an interview Tuesday with Lou Dobbs.
"I think no later than tomorrow," Powell said of the lawsuit. "It's just going to be -- it's a massive document. And it's going to have a lot of exhibits."
"Do you think that we're going to see the Trump presidency saved?" Dobbs asked.
"Yes, I definitely do," Powell answered. "There's no issue in my mind but that he was elected in an absolute landslide nationwide."
"There's no doubt that the software was created and used in Venezuela to control the elections and make sure that Hugo Chavez was always reelected as the dictator of Venezuela, in what appeared to be -- quote -- "free and fair elections" -- end quote," she said. "But they were manipulated by the software used in the Dominion machines and used by other machines in the United States, frankly. And we are just continuing to be inundated by evidence of all the frauds here, and every manner and means of fraud you could possibly think of."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I’ve seen a lot of “magic” with technology, so the fact that there are machine-created ballots is enough for me to believe that everyone of those machines should be examined, hardware and software.
Your dead soul does not know blessing is. When the command comes to you, do not accept the mark of the beast. I tell you now because the Redeemed will not be here to warn you then Do not take the mark.
Actually. Wood has affidavits from people who saw what happened. The video is corroborating evidence.
Hoping just dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s
Yes, but he doesn't actually have the video. Interestingly, he's demanded it and been rebuffed.
So they can ignore his subpoena?
He appealed to the 11th circuit yesterday and no doubt will go to SCOTUS if ruled against.
Wood had two filings. The first was on 11/13 which was regarding the fact that the SOS made a secret deal with democrats in March 2020 which changed election laws in regards to absentee signature verification and curing. Such changes to election law must go through GA legislature, so what he did was illegal as are his changed to the GA election process.
Second, Wood filed a TRO to delay certification of the vote in GA so that the evidence of fraud could be investigated, in which there were 160 pages of exhibits showing fraud.
The judge was only supposed to rule on the TRO, but it appears he ruled on both, which is an overstep and pretty unusual. His reason for his ruling is that Wood, as a GA voter, had no standing to challenge how the votes were counted.
His subpoena was yesterday afternoon, where do you see it was rebuffed?
With all the down ballot stuff, I don't think it could be possible to shuffle out Trump ballots and replace with Biden ballots and keep the totals the same as reported for each candidate for each race. You would have to have the ballots presorted or you would have to replace 100% of the ballots. At some point you just have to give up on the idea.
There is a lot more potential in the "valid" vs. "invalid" ballot arguments. Let's check the signatures. The one depressing thing in Georgia though is that absentee ballots were only mailed out by request, so it isn't like there were ballots flooding the streets like in some states.
Here is something that is interesting though. Before the June primary Georgia sent an application for absentee ballot to ALL voters. In the General election, they did not do this. As I understand it, the SoS did not mail the applications because of pressure from the GOP. We might have shot ourselves in the foot on that one.
Wonderful, and thank you.
His original request to Raffensperger was rebuffed.
Link?
If the hand recounts were close, and I believe they were, then the only time you could conceivably do it was while the ballots were being first input. How long did it take for Georgia to finish the first count?
If you just stuck to a couple of precincts and a few unobserved hours, you could do a lot of damage. For example, you could swap out batches of 100 ballots at a time. Substituting a mixed batch with a batch of pristine ballots might be a crude way of doing it. There could be other ways. You wouldn't necessarily need a lot of people.
The count took a while (days), but only in “certain” counties, i.e. the metropolitan Atlanta counties. If you take the accumulation of reports regarding access to observe, the water main break which never was, etc. you come to the best opportunity for fraud and that was with the absentee ballots. One reason for that is that once the ballot is removed from the envelope it can never be traced back to it again. You should have the total number of ballots identified though. If the signatures aren’t matched and invalid ballots rejected and if the process is not allowed to be closely observed, then fraud is easier in that process.
How many names do you posy unde4r at FR? I have not posted to you under the name you are using for this post. LOL, amazing gaggle of fraudulent posters working FR of late.
LOL ... what’s this obsession with your butt? LOL
Mail-in ballots and the absentees are all mailed out to the voter. How many of those ballots were counted that had never been folded. The ballot is first folded when sent on an envelope out to the requestor. The presence of mail in ballots that have never been folded is a clear proof of fraud ... in the tens of thousands in GA.
Well, then, there are at least two opportunities for fraud - unmatched signatures - ballot stuffing from nursing homes, deceased people still on the rolls, infrequent voters, etc, or, secondly ballot swapping.
You’d need to be unobserved for the latter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.