To: SeekAndFind
On to the U.S. Supreme Court we go!
3 posted on
11/23/2020 5:25:40 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: SoConPubbie
6 posted on
11/23/2020 5:26:14 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: SoConPubbie
On to the U.S. Supreme Court we go!
This is a state court, why would it go to the SCOTUS? They might try a federal court, but I doubt they would take it up.
17 posted on
11/23/2020 5:30:00 PM PST by
JoSixChip
(Its not about color, its about character.)
To: SoConPubbie
I cannot imagine the Supreme Court abiding this nonsense. It is an affront to the Constitution and makes an already corrupt election a ridiculous farce.
To: SoConPubbie
Absolutely!!
Enough is enough!
Supreme Court MUST OVERTURN this Election Fraud.
To: SoConPubbie
Yup. that was the plan for SCOTUS. There was a reason why Graham was nominating more than 200 judges like clockwork for 4 years BECAUSE of these assholes.
51 posted on
11/23/2020 6:05:11 PM PST by
max americana
(fired liberal employees at every election since 2008 because I enjoy seeing them cry )
To: SoConPubbie
It is in the US Constitution that one must be a US Citizen to vote in Federal elections I believe.
To: SoConPubbie
It is in the US Constitution that one must be a US Citizen to vote in Federal elections I believe.
To: SoConPubbie
On to the U.S. Supreme Court we go!SCOTUS is not going to hear a case about 8,000 ballots in Pennsylvania-- it won't change the outcome in that state, much less in the total EC votes.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson