RE: She better and I hope to hell she does otherwise, she and Rudy and the rest of us will be made to look like conspiracy nuts.
FROM THE INTERVIEW:
“First of all, I never say anything I can’t prove. Secondly, the evidence is coming in so fast I can’t even process it all. Millions of Americans have written by now, I would say, definitely hundreds of thousands have stepped forward with their different experiences of voter fraud but this is massive election fraud and I’m very concerned it not only involved Dominion and its Smartmatic software but that the software was essentially used by other election machines also. It’s absolutely brazen how people bought this system and why they bought this system”
Interestingly enough, Powell stated that the software’s user manual talks about how “votes can be wiped away.”
Powell stated whistleblowers came forward over alleged paybacks. She said in states where the new election technology was purchased and implemented, there’s evidence of officials’ family members being paid large lump sums of money.
There are other concerns about how the software can be utilized. The attorney stated software and election officials have the ability to do things like delete ballots, force the machine not to read voters’ signatures or the down ballot. Powell said there’s also the ability for the machine to be programed to only count votes for Biden.
“It’s like drag and drop whatever you want wherever you want, upload votes,” she explained.
Powell said the campaign has a sworn affidavit from a person who knows how the system works and was allegedly there when the system was being created and implemented.
There are only two possibilities — IT IS EITHER TRUE OR FALSE.
Not sure of there are any gray areas... if you can think of one, maybe you can share your thoughts with us.
So what they have an affidavit of someone who knows how it works and it can drag and drop votes to whomever you want. Dominion will come up with a 100 people who will say differently. Who will Judges believe the one or the 100?
Having someone talk about being involved years ago when the system was created & seeing how it can be used to change votes, means nothing now. The other side will trot out some mouthpiece and say. after the system was questioned by both democrats & republican’s in 2016, the company made improvements, so what the “expert” witness is saying is no longer doable.. “We fixed it” will be the defense.
She needs someone who will say they were involved in changing votes, or they can name someone who made the system alter the votes counts, or they have retrieved data from the machines used that show votes were altered. Without that all she has nothing.
I don’t mind being thought of as a kooky conspiracy nut.
The fraud was so obvious—the first time there’s been Presidential coattails with no coat, and the first time in history all of those bellwether counties were “wrong” in predicting the “winner.”
That said, it’s true that the easier we make voting—more and more mail in—the harder it will be for Republicans to win. Dems are lazy and like to vote from the ease of home.