Having someone talk about being involved years ago when the system was created & seeing how it can be used to change votes, means nothing now. The other side will trot out some mouthpiece and say. after the system was questioned by both democrats & republican’s in 2016, the company made improvements, so what the “expert” witness is saying is no longer doable.. “We fixed it” will be the defense.
She needs someone who will say they were involved in changing votes, or they can name someone who made the system alter the votes counts, or they have retrieved data from the machines used that show votes were altered. Without that all she has nothing.
She needs someone who will say they were involved in changing votes, or they can name someone who made the system alter the votes counts, or they have retrieved data from the machines used that show votes were altered. Without that all she has nothing
___________________________
Disagree, an IT or Data Analysis expert can point to the various data points accumulated in key precincts on Nov 3 and the 4th. The pattern of data points - Trump and Biden votes - dramatically changing at key times will be evidence of the fraud.
The experts can show stark deviations on the x and y axis that simply would not have occurred unless there was human manipulation of the data.
This will be the evidence.
Pedo Joe and the Rats are going down.
All the counting machine should be impounded and the Dominion operating system should be investigated for code that allows vote flipping. Those machines with such code should disqualify the votes ran on them.