Posted on 11/15/2020 9:05:41 AM PST by SaxxonWoods
"The system was not safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation."
"...evidence is coming in like a firehose..."
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“....but also concur with other posters who have previously said it’s a bad idea to lay all cards on the table prematurely.”
Of course. It would be like a General publishing his battle plan in the newspaper.
Also, if this is likely to lead to one or more high-profile arrests, you don’t want to risk tipping anyone off, lest they flee the country.
I hope it doesn’t come to that but I also am not quite sure that if biden gets in that we won’t all be on here typing again for four years.
There is the romantic, the adventurous the swashbuckling...
and then there’s the truth of what will likely happen.
She implied that due to the magnanimity of the fraud, the entire election might be overturned and/or just sent to the state legislators...regardless of the certification date. Hence the "Release the Kraken" comment.
Just my take.
Scott Adams has this “solution” (not prediction): Trump absolutely proves massive election fraud, the media refuse to report it, the courts may or may not rule on it, and in the end Trump, like George Washington (who could have been re-elected for a third term), decides to only serve one term even though he could have (and in Trump’s case, did) serve again.
And then Trump forms his own media company because now we all know the real power is the media—the power to report on only lies, and disappear actual stories.
I watched the video and formed a completely different impression. I would not characterize any of what she said as “word salad” and felt that she answered all of the questions very well and appropriately. She simply cannot detail all of her arguments before they are presented in court. She cannot make statements that she is unable expound on before the court proceedings. I am sorry that you have your panties in a wad over this legal reality.
Patiently waiting but if the democrats run the clock out and thus, the election is not overturned due to that technicality, then we will always live in a world where voting no longer matters. Fraud can happen during every election and there will be nothing anyone can do.
JoMa
Why tell the enemy the plan?
Do you think this isn’t a war?
It’s amazing that Adams still has no idea who Trump is.
> She has completely ignored answering that question in two successive interviews, this being the second.
I wouldn’t have given a straight answer to that question either - since what a court and/or state legislatures and/or congress may do is not fully in my control.
If she does succeed in winning this fight, she has my vote for AG after useless Barr gets sh*tcanned.
I would like to think that the day we storm the White House that the Secret Service will have a serious case of the Blue Flu that day. I do believe that they are patriots.
20+ election litigation cases and not one mentions Dominion; https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/
I’d like to see less interviews on fox/newsmax/America’s Voice and more action on this Dominion/SmartMatic thing. It’s something Barr’s DOJ should be working on.
For decades you could just pass on the northeast and the west coast as democrat, it was a given it was a pointless cause when it came to voting on anything. Why? we can see why.
Well, it wasn’t his prediction—just his “solution.”
I have a very open mind, and know Trump’s odds are pretty good, I think. I remember Florida 2000 very well and it felt like it took forever to find out who the President would be. It was practically Christmas before we knew.
I don’t have normalcy bias and I know anything can happen when you live through history.
What’s annoying (among other things) is during Election 2000 both sides had press conferences every day and the media would report on it.
You mean "enormity" of the fraud.
Going to need to produce source code to backup claim.
Absolutely. Other than providing the other side with the information required to comply with the discovery process, there is no reason to let your opponent know any more about your case than is absolutely necessary. While to my knowledge the defendants in these lawsuits are likely to be state government officials, we know that every democrat is first and foremost a leftist activist. No reason to help them know what to hide, or to construct better arguments.
If she does succeed in winning this fight, she has my vote for AG after useless Barr gets sh*tcanned.
Yes imagine a lawyer being the third person we can trust behind Trump and Grenell in Washington...lol
The big difference is that in 2000 there was only 1 state in dispute. Also, it was a counting technicality that was the center of the lawsuit. This is much bigger and affects several states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.