Posted on 11/12/2020 3:30:50 AM PST by RoosterRedux
You should learn three main things from this post: (1) The Supreme Court can consider statistical evidence of fraud and can order a new election. (2) Most of the computers used for voting in America have a built-in mechanism that allows votes to be weighted in favor of a candidate. (3) If someone does tell a computer to mess with the election outcome, the computer’s processes will inevitably create unnatural data trails that prove human intervention in vote counts – and that’s what happened in three Michigan counties.
*snip*
Some of the statistical data Trump needs can be found in the video at the bottom of this post. In it, Shiva Ayyadurai, Ph.D., a multi-credentialed MIT grad whom leftists despise works with Bennie Smith, a software engineer, election commissioner, and data analyst, and Phil Evans, and inventor, engineer, and data analyst, to show massive voting machine fraud in three Michigan counties.
Ayyadurai leads with some fundamentals.
First, most vote tabulation using computers is fraught with ambiguity and the potential for error. As we’ve learned, the ballots going into the system can be fraudulent (dead voters, fake voters, faked ballots, etc.). Democrat-run states increase the potential for fraud with mass mail-in voting, prohibitions against voter ID, and a failure to check signatures.
Second, we don’t know what goes on inside the computers. The computers work by taking a snapshot of each ballot and then working off the snapshot. By law, these snapshots must be saved for 22 months, but Democrat-run counties and states tend to delete them immediately.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
There will be a trail, and that is what will do in the Democrats.
So if they are deleted it is like the votes were never there? Just some number a person dreamed up?
If this goes to the USSC I’m for sure not hanging my hat on Roberts or Kavanaugh. They’ve both been a big disappointment to me.
There is at least one tool that leaves no evidence of its entry, what it did, and deletion. I saw it yesterday, but can’t discover where I found it - but was used this election. Name was something like ‘uTool’.
There is no security and no audit trail—these systems are purposefully designed to be insecure. There is absolutely no way this is not intentional.
If we were serious about proving this, someone should just hack the entire system and discard the entire election!
When people cheat, computers do what they are told like guns
Qsnatch?
The vote total vs time graphs are very telling. How did Trump loose votes that he had?
The enablers of the computer fraud aspect of this election theft need to be found and severely punished.
The DELIAN Project: Democracy through Technology
Commitment by DELIAN Project
In 2014, Dominion Voting committed to providing emerging and post-conflict democracies with access to voting technology through its philanthropic support to the DELIAN Project, as many emerging democracies suffer from post-electoral violence due to the delay in the publishing of election results. Over the next three years, Dominion Voting will support election technology pilots with donated Automated Voting Machines (AVM), providing an improved electoral process, and therefore safer elections. As a large number of election staff are women, there will be an emphasis on training women, who will be the first to benefit from the skills transfer training and use of AVMs. It is estimated that 100 women will directly benefit from election technology skills training per pilot election
I would bet BIG, IF there were a way to prove the fact, that Trump got 60% of every vote cast for prez. Maybe more, but I’d bet on 60%
Rudy will be talking to this guy. IT guy who examined the Dominion manuals.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1326715838850764802.html
Dr Shiva Ayydupie is a bit daft. He claimed he invented e-mail when he was 16 and several other phony claims. Please look him up. Not the best witness or expert!
How so with Kavanaugh?
Not to worry. The next election will not use voting machines anyway. Votes will be cast using a Smart Phone Voting Application.
If you can buy a car or a house on your phone, why can’t you vote too
The democrats, and their planted judges, will likely dismiss all of the various methods of cheating as inconsequential to the outcome of the election. The smoking gun will be the widespread use of the computer program switching and deleting votes. Certainly Trump must be smart enough to know that. And also realize that the swampy DOJ is not going to assist him, so he would need outside experts to have access inside the government, which might explain some of the firings and resignations.
I don't think they will order that the electoral votes go to Biden or at least I don't think Kavanaugh would do this. Most likely the USSC will kick it to the state legislature to choose or not choose the electors.
Good point. I don’t know what would be needed to make the process secure. But my immediate reaction is that there would be more of an audit Trail. Potentially: GPS location, ip address, mac address, whatever token or unique identifier developed in the app, personally identifiable information, probably more.
Last assumption, the greatest risk would be who designs and codes this. The wrong persons would make it another Dominion.
Qsnatch?
—
Yeah that’s one - was going to go back an read about it but forgot. Apparently it played a big role in the election cheating - but that’s all I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.