SUSPICIOUS: Tens of Thousands of PA Ballots Were Allegedly Returned Earlier Than They Were Sent

News emerged on Tuesday that many ballots in the state of Pennsylvania appear to have been returned to be counted, earlier than they were sent, causing great suspicion that there was alleged voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election.

The news of the ballots comes on the same day that President Donald J. Trump tweeted about Ballot counting abuse.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 10, 2020 Epoch Times reported on Tuesday about the suspicious ballots:

‘More than 20,000 absentee ballots in Pennsylvania have impossible return dates and another more than 80,000 have return dates that raise questions, according to a researcher’s analysis of the state’s voter database.

Over 51,000 ballots were marked as returned just a day after they were sent out—an extraordinary speed, given U.S. Postal Service (USPS) delivery times, while nearly 35,000 were returned on the same day they were mailed out. Another more than 23,000 have a return date earlier than the sent date. More than 9,000 have no sent date.

The state’s voter records are being scrutinized as President Donald Trump is challenging the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania and other states where his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, holds a tight lead. The Trump campaign is alleging that invalid ballots have been counted for Democrats and valid ballots for Republicans were thrown away.

The analysis of the publicly available data was conducted by a data researcher who submitted it first to the Chinese-language edition of The Epoch Times. The researcher, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said he consulted about the matter with several USPS field engineers, who said the return dates shown in the database are “impossible.”

I looked at all the sources including the Harris fact check site mentioned by Tchad

I found the data was first submitted to the Chinese language version of the Epoch Times On the original article

I found that Epoch Times is affiliated with Falun Gong which mortally opposes Red China and which at least in theory I have no truck with

I can’t find who actually submitted or compiled this data

Does anyone have that ?

I already knew the ET/FG intersectionality

From Wki....which I don’t like either but that sure doesn’t make me question Epoch Times any less....there ar red Chinese and there are nationalist free Chinese and Epoch is just that which makes it hard for me to see them in the pejorative if they indeed are behind this

The Epoch Times "generally stayed out of U.S. politics" before 2016, "unless they dovetailed with Chinese interests," according to a report by NBC News. Ben Hurley, a former Epoch Times employee until 2013, stated that the newspaper was critical toward abortion and LGBT and that Falun Gong practitioners "saw communism everywhere" including in internationalist figures like Hillary Clinton and Kofi Annan, "but there was more room for disagreements in the early days." Since 2016, according to NBC News, The Epoch Times has promoted favorable coverage of Donald Trump's campaign and presidency, and emphasized issues such as Islamic terrorism and illegal immigration to the United States. It has also emphasized "what the publication claims is a labyrinthian, global conspiracy led by [Hillary] Clinton and former President Barack Obama to tear down Trump."[18]

A former Epoch Times reporter who covered the 2016 campaign, Steve Klett, said his editors had encouraged favorable coverage of Trump after he won the Republican nomination, and that "They seemed to have this almost messianic way of viewing Trump as the anti-Communist leader who would bring about the end of the Chinese Communist Party."[21] After Trump was elected, The Epoch Times hired Brendan Steinhauser, a Tea Party strategist, to reach out to more conservatives and encourage the Trump administration to oppose the persecution of Falun Gong.[21]

The Epoch Times editor-in-chief Jasper Fakkert wrote in a letter to readers: "We see the Trump administration's efforts to change socialist policies in America, as well as set policies to counter infiltration and subversion by China, as remarkable reversals from past policies, and sincere efforts that, if fully realized, will benefit America and the world as a whole."[22] The Epoch Times picks up mainstream newswire stories and in some places can resemble a community newspaper.[63] According to sociologist Yuezhi Zhao, "While mainstream newspapers typically treat Web versions as an extension of the already-existing print version, The Epoch Times website serves as the master for all its worldwide papers."[30]

The Epoch Times is known for alleging conspiracies involving former Communist Party general secretary Jiang Zemin,[64] under whose administration Falun Gong was suppressed in China.

We win AZ and GA, and either get PA or it gets tossed for “irredeemable” corruption and then either the state legislature sends a slate or it doesn’t.

I see the first two, AZ and GA as probable. At that point Trump leads 260 to 259 with PA off the board and it goes to the House, where the Rs have more state delegations. The Senate is tougher (VP selection), but we should win both seats in GA, if the Ds are not allowed to cheat again, and retain the majority. It’s the current body that votes, anyway, and we still retain the majority even if we lose the McSally vote. Gotta watch out for defections like Collins or Romney.

If PA is counted for Biden (the fraud stands) it’s basically over. He’ll get GA (fraud) and recounts in Trump states. I don’t see that happening without a major backlash. A violent one. It might be most politically expedient for the SCOTUS to simply tell the PA Legislature to do their job. Or the deadline is missed, and PA does not certify. That all is subject to any number of types of interference, from flat-out extortion and bribery to threats of violence to any kind of harassment. Messy. But if PA is counted for Trump, it’s all over the other way. Still there will be screams from the left, but at least some of that will be from prison.

Earlier Trump complained about the process in Pennsylvania:
<><> "They wouldn't let us watch or observe. That's a big thing.
<><> Votes that went through during the time [Trump observers] weren't there should be tossed .
<><> Trump's court case prevailed when the judge ordered [the observers] back.......
<><> but that was after two days; millions of votes could have gone through. Millions.

But Pres Trump should know PA has "Established Law" WRT vote fraud. "Established" occurs frequently in the US Constitution,
used there to mean: "to settle firmly, to fix unalterably; as in to establish justice, which is the avowed object of the Constitution."

ESTABLISHED LAW IN 1994 CASE: After hearing Republicans testify during a four-day civil trial, Federal Judge Newcomer ruled
"Substantial evidence established massive absentee ballot fraud, deception, intimidation, harassment and forgery," for example:
<><> Democrat William G. Stinson patently stole the election from Rep Bruce S. Marks in No. Philly's Second Senatorial District
<><> Newcomer ruled the seat was stolen via an elaborate fraud;
<><> from the get-go, Dem election fraud encouraged hundreds of residents to vote by absentee ballot;
<><> Democratic campaign workers oftentimes forged absentee ballots;
<><> many forged ballots contained names of non-residents, those in prison, and a deceased voter.
<><> Rep's pointed out door-to-door solicitation by Democrats was impermissible under the state election code,
<><> PA's law stipulates the County Bd of Elections "shall deliver or mail" ballots to a voter.

Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
WH EMAIL CONTACT PAGE https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.