Posted on 11/10/2020 4:34:07 AM PST by Kaslin
People:
1) None of this fraud stuff will prove at “court of law” levels. There isn’t time for that to happen, regardless. So it must be pursued and evidence gathered, but no court is ever going to declare the evidence sufficient.
2) The true court for this stuff is the legislatures. They appoint the Electors. And ONLY they appoint the Electors. They are Republican in the relevant states. The level of proof required to persuade Republican legislators is far easier than “court of law” levels.
3) Make no mistake here. THIS is the path and only path to victory. The legislators have to be persuaded to appoint Trump Electors. In all relevant states. I would expect PA and WI and MI Dem governors to seat their own slate of Electors and send some countering document to Washington.
4) At that point and only at that point would the USSC be involved. The case would not involve the USSC determining fraud. It involves an interpretation of the Constitution and who gets to appoint Electors. The Constitution is very clear that it is the state legislature who appoints Electors. The ruling would be pro Trump.
5) Someone needs to look at a list of Trump states with majority votes for which of them have Dem legislatures.
Good grief...
down from 16,952
When votes get counted and not just passed on.
The answer is none. Only Maine has a Trump electoral vote with a Dem state legislature. They could take that vote away. But only 1.
THIS is the only path to victory. Persuade Republican state legislatures to declare fraud and appoint Trump Electors.
That would win.
Yes, I think those are now our best bets.
Those states are likely to have different laws governing the way electors are chosen, and what you have to do to challenge electors.
Awesome patriot!!! We are blessed to have her in Ohio.
Let’s get specific:
1) I said Trump would win with “between 320 and 340 EVs.”
Since this is horribly tainted by fraud, it’s hard to judge. At the very least he still can win with about 300 EVs. I doubt they will waste much time on fraud in MN and NV, which would give him 322, but . . .
2) I said the Rs would hold the senate at best 53-47, at worst 51-49. We are at the latter but with John James in contention and with the GA race in a runoff. So, probably right on the money.
3) I said we would come close in the House but fall short. We are now at 207 with another 7 seats likely to go R.
4) I said Trump would nationally get 12-15% of the black vote (BINGO-—12%) with another “4-5% staying home” (BINGO: the black vote was about 4% off where we can accurately measure it in FL and NC).
5) I said Trump would win FL by “2-3 points.” BINGO
6) I said Trump would “come close” to winning a majority of Hispanics in FL. (48%)
Now, since you’re so concerned I-—unlike anyone else on FR-—will actually point out to you where I was wrong:
I said Trump would carry every one of his 2016 states with a higher margin. Right in FL, MI, WI, PA, wrong in NC, AZ, GA. Almost exactly the same in NV.
Again, however, we don’t know what role fraud played in all of these. It’s entirely possible I was right across the board. For example, he lost NY by only 13 points.
He came up about 1 point lower in OH than in 2016-—but, sigh, again we don’t know what role fraud played in that.
In short, when you compare my predictions to those of virtually every pollster except Baris, they are far better.
Did Ohio State Rep Candice Keller write this?
LS -- note the skull and crossbones flag. Do you know of any lawyers who could comment whether this is actionable?Here are two attorneys attempting to help Trump overturn the will of the Pennsylvanian people.
Ronald Hicks
412.235.1476
rhicks@porterwright.com
Carolyn McGee
412.235.1488
cmcgee@porterwright.com
Make them famous. 🏴☠️ pic.twitter.com/YwjMGvTqcW— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) November 10, 2020
Somehow I thought the software “glitch” happened in the wee hours; there was a vertical line in the votes vs. time graphs for MI, WI, and PA.
Wouldn’t the phase 1 (s/w “glitch”) and phase 2 (ballot stuffing) show up as vertical lines on —both— Trump’s and biden’s graphs?
Baris was in touch with Ducey’s people: apparently these are the “good” parts of Maricopa. VERY DOABLE. 2) Ducey, whom I have been very hard on due to the lockdowns, has been stellar in this fight. His team has figured out exactly how many ballots are outstanding, so there can be no more mysterious last-minute ballots. Baris thinks now Trump wins AZ by 6,000
You are now less hopeful. I also note you are not quoting Baris anymore. What changed?
FReegards!
Baris has not commented. But I don’t think a 6,000 lead out of 61,000 is doable.
Esp. with 18,000 of the votes being in Pima, even though provisional.
Military ballots. Always go last in ‘old-style’ absentee states, which AZ probably still is (ie, not yet all-in on PA-style fraud). However this does not exclude ACTIVE ongoing Democrat fraud on-the-fly in AZ right NOW.
p
Thanks for the update!!!
Without the massive fraud, your high-end EV estimate of 340 would have probably been blown out.
Also, we may not have lost the House in 2018. Pete Sessions in TX-32 DISCOVERED the cheating in computer tabulation and tried very diligently to get the FBI involved. He wanted the election overthrown due to the FRAUD.
But this was IGNORED along with a lot of other things.
Seeing that ES&S is just as susceptible to fraud as Dominion due to the fact that the local networked machines for each site can be connected to the internet AND the make up of the variety of software services involved and underlying configurations are very similar... it would be prudent to look at ES&S as well.
You do quality work. Thanks for all you do. I enjoyed your broadcast on election night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.