Posted on 11/09/2020 8:39:11 PM PST by Truthsearcher
ZVBXRPL.
The only thing I can remember this being applied to was the scene at the race track when Groucho gets scammed :)
Is that where’s it’s from.
And Groucho says something like I had this same horse when I went to the eye doctor :)
Yes, Day at the Races, the Brothers’ first flick for MGM. Not one of their best but funny just the same...
I love that movie!
The race track scene, the scene when groucho pretends to be different people on the phone from Florida
And the scene during the examination of Margaret Dumont was classic!
“The doctor seems reluctant to discuss his medical experiences.”
“Medically, my experiences have been most unexciting. Except during the flu epidemic.”
“What happened?”
“I got the flu.”
lol
I would say they did us a favor, but we'd have won outright on election night without that.
But, they all broke the law, and hopefully the SC will see it that way.
“It would be interesting to see how many votes in those counties were cast by students paying out of state tuition (i.e. not residents of Pa.)...”
...who ALSO cast ballots in their home States.
“NICE FRESH PARKING!”
I hope those paragraphs are full of compelling facts.
Well (and I am not a lawyer) but in my limited understanding that is if the plaintiffs do not choose to bolster their case by filing an amended complaint with even more allegations.
by the way, it is interesting that the plaintiffs are trump and one common Georgia citizen (I suspect this is to forestall dismissal attempts due to alleged lack of standing, but just a wag). also for some reason beyond me, there are no john doe defendants listed (although iirc that can be amended easily enough if needed at the initial stages).
Filing an amended complaint only kicks the can down the road, because with each amended complaint, the defendant will have more time to answer.
I am a lawyer with more than 35 years experience as a litigator, and I can state with 100% certainty that DJT must seek a TRO/PI now if he wants any chance of a second term.
great! thanks for the informed response (much better than my non-lawyer musings)!
“I just see a lot of “whoops”, “we’re sorry and will do better next time”, “had to keep the observers at a distance due to COVID” and a bunch of other excuses.”
To which the Court can reply...”well if proper accurate and openly transparent counting an processing of ballots was such a concern then perhaps the choosing of the electors should have been turned over to the legislature for this year.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.