It is not being corrected, if this is what they reported, the data is being transferred to a ballot that printed correctly. If they tried to scan the misprinted ballot things would be in the wrong positions, so it would not correctly register the vote or whom they had voted for, because the positional data would not be in the correct place.
And without a witness from both parties to observe the process, how do I know whether my vote was "transferred" correctly or whether it was stolen?
Even if legitimate, how do we know they aren't PICKING JUST BIDEN REJECTED BALLOTS?
How do we know? The only reasonable way to get out of the RAT's planned for mess is to redo elections in 2 weeks. Republican legislatures have to make the rules for in person voting only.
Do re-votes only in states with obvious fraud such as filling out ballots to make them "readable."
An interesting explanation, but I don’t see anything in Pennsylvania law that would allow that. See post 41. At most, I could see doing this for an electronic double-check of a hand-count of the misprints, but the “misprints” need to be preserved and counted or rejected as the official ballot.
[It is not being corrected, if this is what they reported, the data is being transferred to a ballot that printed correctly. If they tried to scan the misprinted ballot things would be in the wrong positions, so it would not correctly register the vote or whom they had voted for, because the positional data would not be in the correct place.]
Ok, if this is in fact true, shouldn’t the misprinted ballots and the corrected/transferred ballots stay together afterwards to preserve the records as factual? Otherwise there can be no accurate record keeping.