Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delingpole: Why Won’t Top Medical Journals Publish Landmark Danish Mask Study?
Breibart ^ | )ctober 27, 2020 | by James Delingpole

Posted on 10/27/2020 8:44:18 AM PDT by nikos1121

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: TStro

If putting a piece of cloth over your face causes any respiratory issues for you, you should seek immediate medical attention because there is something seriously wrong. Even fairly unhealthy people will have no medical problems associated with wearing a simple mask. You’d have to be at the point where you already require nonstop supplemental oxygen before you’d have any issue with a simple piece of cloth being across your face.

If these claims held any water whatsoever, people would have been collapsing and dying left and right across the world where masks have been very common for months. Lo and behold! No bodies lining the streets from mask-collapse!


21 posted on 10/27/2020 9:51:36 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
These include the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the American Medical Association’s journal JAMA.

All three endorsed Obamacare.

Hmmmm....

22 posted on 10/27/2020 9:53:46 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
"flu is down by 98% this year. What’s up with that? Couldn’t be that a bunch of the reported “covid” deaths are actually the flu?"

No, because flu cases outside of flu season (which typically ends in March) drop to single digits over the summer for the entire United States. And that "98%" is misleading as well. The 2019-2020 flu season started earlier than usual. If you compare the 2020-2021 flu season to the previous 5 years, we're seeing normal flu activity for this time of year. Last I checked, 121 confirmed flu cases so far since the end of September, ramping up in the past two weeks as expected.

23 posted on 10/27/2020 9:54:21 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

Maybe it might be nice if these scientists were actually able to publish their scientific findings on their study specifically about masks.

One can only conclude the scientific findings go against conventional wisdom, political ideology, And the government dictates. And governments hate to be shown that they are wrong.


24 posted on 10/27/2020 9:55:41 AM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

“No bodies lining the streets from mask-collapse!”

No bodies lining the streets from not wearing a mask either!


25 posted on 10/27/2020 9:58:05 AM PDT by VastRWCon (Fake News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
He said masked were dangerous then.

Three days ago from the link that I posted to, “Fauci, the nation’s top infectious disease expert, told CNN’s Erin Burnett, “If people are not wearing masks, well then maybe we should be mandating it.””

26 posted on 10/27/2020 10:00:20 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Have you read their paper?

One can conclude many things if one has no context. For instance, one could easily conclude that the paper is so poorly constructed that no journal wants to be associated with it. Or that the methodology was so poor that no useful conclusions can be drawn. Or that the claims made are unsubstantiated by the evidence presented.

There are many reasons why papers get rejected from scientific journals. Have you ever tried to publish findings in a journal? There’s an in-depth review process that takes places and often you have to make adjustments in order to meet the standards. Those adjustments are typically more about ensuring that others are able to replicate your results. If you just make claims and provide no way to verify them, it doesn’t matter whether your claims are right or wrong. Science must be verifiable.


27 posted on 10/27/2020 10:01:11 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VastRWCon

That’s not the claim being addressed. The claim is that masks create serious medical issues. If they did, we’d see evidence of that since hundreds of millions of people have been wearing masks for months now. We see no evidence of that. The claims are nonsense.


28 posted on 10/27/2020 10:02:12 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

There are many reasons why papers get rejected from scientific journals. Have you ever tried to publish findings in a journal? There’s an in-depth review process that takes places and often you have to make adjustments in order to meet the standards. Those adjustments are typically more about ensuring that others are able to replicate your results. If you just make claims and provide no way to verify them, it doesn’t matter whether your claims are right or wrong. Science must be verifiable.

Verified? What, like the laptop from Hell?

Perhaps it is more the results are similarly don’t fit the current narrative and are being assiduously ignored.


29 posted on 10/27/2020 10:38:13 AM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
"Masks really reduce aeration."

This experiment says otherwise.

Multiple mask test.

I'm gonna do my own test with a variety of masks to see for myself. Not that any of the true believers in the hazards of masks will accept it or do their own tests. I'll let you know. :)

30 posted on 10/27/2020 10:51:55 AM PDT by calenel (Don't panic. Prepare and be vigilant. Join the war effort. On the human side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Have you read the paper?

My point is this is all pure speculation. If the research is worthwhile, they can simply put the paper up on the web for free and make it freely available to the world. If the research is great, it will speak for itself. The journals do not have some magical stranglehold on information flow. But they do have standards. And they have every right to reject any paper that doesn’t meet their standards.


31 posted on 10/27/2020 11:01:28 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

“And that “98%” is misleading as well.”

Seems like you can’t trust a thing you read these days.

Were there always so many liars amongst us?


32 posted on 10/27/2020 11:09:22 AM PDT by dsc (Do not pray for easy lives; pray to be stronger men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

“If they did, we’d see evidence of that since hundreds of millions of people have been wearing masks for months now.”

There are other things that the fakenews outlets are not reporting. Perhaps they’re not reporting this.


33 posted on 10/27/2020 11:11:59 AM PDT by dsc (Do not pray for easy lives; pray to be stronger men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dsc

Yes, but their lies only spreading by word of mouth limited their impact. The Internet enables liars to have more reach than ever before. Sadly, news drifted away from being a loss-leading informer of fact into an entertainment medium where lies are perfectly well accepted.


34 posted on 10/27/2020 11:22:17 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dsc

There’s nothing to report. Doctors and nurses have worn masks for over a century with no ill effect. Masks are worn regularly by painters, construction workers, contractors, architects, dentists, dental hygienists, carpenters, nail salon employees, janitorial staff working with certain cleaning chemicals, laboratory staff, factory workers... Literally dozens of professions for decades or longer.

Yet suddenly now the moment somebody says “oh hey everyone really should wear a mask during this pandemic”, now out of the blue a simple piece of cloth cover the nose and mouth is going to cause everyone’s eyes to pop out of their skulls and their lungs to collapse? It’s absurd.


35 posted on 10/27/2020 11:29:49 AM PDT by 2aProtectsTheRest (The media is banging the fear drum enough. Don't help them do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

There is a reason why I keep calling masks ‘training burkhas’. You have stated it.


36 posted on 10/27/2020 12:06:21 PM PDT by T. Rustin Noone (the angels wanna wear my red shoes......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2aProtectsTheRest

My inability to come up with any reasonable argument against your position leads me to believe you are right.


37 posted on 10/27/2020 12:12:23 PM PDT by dsc (Do not pray for easy lives; pray to be stronger men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EBH

I’m sorry to hear that.

I’ve been working from home since March and don’t have to wear a mask much - only when at grocery store, etc.

Last week, we had a special, unusual meeting at work, which I think was a ruse to check on how we were doing because I think one lady killed herself.

Anyway, I tripped over some weird foamy object that was on the floor for some reason and didn’t see it, even though it wasn’t small, because it was close in color to the carpeting and my glasses fogged up.

Fortunately, I just got bruised.


38 posted on 10/27/2020 10:28:58 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calenel

I would like to see that mask test done while he exerts himself. Where I live, you have to wear a mask working out in the gym.


39 posted on 10/27/2020 10:44:09 PM PDT by KittyKares (Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

Thanks for the empathy.

Be careful, but this whole mask thing is unreasonable and may worse by the fearful karens. Now if I have to manage stairs I remove my mask.

I cannot afford a stupid mask mandate bankrupt me for wearing it!


40 posted on 10/28/2020 2:35:27 AM PDT by EBH (My family fought for Liberty in 1776 and we will do so again. God Save the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson