Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

Been watching on TV. I think Louisville will see some riots about this. Very sad that this lovely woman was killed for no reason.


7 posted on 09/23/2020 10:41:28 AM PDT by Veto! (Political Correctness Offends Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Veto!

100% chance of riot


14 posted on 09/23/2020 10:47:58 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

“Very sad that this lovely woman was killed for no reason.”

What? Your sarc tag is broken?


17 posted on 09/23/2020 10:49:25 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

She knew what she was doing. Instead of watching this on tv, read the tatumreport. The transcripts of the jailhouse phone calls are particularly interesting.


21 posted on 09/23/2020 10:50:45 AM PDT by philled (If this creature is not stopped it could make its way to Novosibirsk!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

Her death is sad, so are the many deaths caused by the way these warrants are carried out. Instead of charging the police for carrying out orders, they should pass Rand Paul’s bill banning them.


29 posted on 09/23/2020 10:54:05 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (2020 four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

1. She was involved in criminal activity which brought the cops to her front door.
2. She was cheating on her man, who was in jail at the time.
3. The dude she was laid up with thought the cops was her man and opened fire on them.

1a. The cops wouldn’t have been there had she not been involved with criminal activity.
2a. She most likely wouldn’t have been involved with either of these two men had she not been involved in criminal activity.


37 posted on 09/23/2020 10:58:41 AM PDT by Mathews (ItÂ’s all gravy, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

Facebook live stream marching down Broadway.


47 posted on 09/23/2020 11:02:44 AM PDT by Bratch (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

The lovely woman who was involved in drug dealing?


76 posted on 09/23/2020 11:21:17 AM PDT by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

“...killed for no reason”.

Well - let’s see. She allowed her known drug-dealing ex-boyfriend to continue to use her apartment as a package drop. And when police showed up, KNOCKED REPEATEDLY, then LOUDLY and REPEATEDLY announced themselves and WHY they were there... she (and the guy that was with her) refused to answer. Police breached the door (standard procedure) and immediately were met by gunfire.

Returning fire is standard and essentially automatic in well-trained police.

Maybe she wasn’t the one who fired at police - but she was FAR from an “innocent bystander”.


115 posted on 09/23/2020 1:10:30 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

She was not shot out of hand. She was standing behind the man who was shooting at police. Her choice of cover was not clever.


122 posted on 09/23/2020 2:01:39 PM PDT by arthurus ( covfefe 22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson