Posted on 09/15/2020 12:44:50 PM PDT by Menehune56
Scientific American on Tuesday endorsed Joe Biden, the first presidential endorsement in the magazine’s 175-year history. Its editors said they felt “compelled” to do so because President Trump’s well-documented rejection of science, from climate change to the coronavirus, has cost tens of thousands of American lives.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Political “science” in action.
SciAm veered off into the weeds of leftist groupthink decades ago. I haven’t read it in 25 years.
Anyone still want to argue that science hasn’t been fully politicized?
But who is the Journal of Irreproducible Results endorsing?
Be woke, be irrelevant.
I used to read SA. Was a subscriber.
That was decades ago. Haven’t opened one since.
Yes. Because this is not science.
I guess they figure that is where they can sell the most magazines....sad.
If I didn’t want to think better of them, I’d say we are witnessing a race to madness, even in the scientific realm.
So much for “science”
Gonna bet Trump’s tipping off the public to HCQ triple therapy has saved thousands who were able to get it
Are they also going to oppose Governor Cuomo?
Did they do a double blind crossover study?
The Piel family owned “Scientific American.” The wife of the Piel owner ran a Communist front group. I don’t know who owns “Scientific American” now, but it is still written as if the Piels still run it.
Yeah, the left is not where you will find the critical thinkers....or thinkers in general....
Yeah, the left is not where you will find the critical thinkers....or thinkers in general....
And, we wonder about the medical field...
Yep, so sad. Decades ago I used to have a subscription.
Well darn. Guess I have to change my vote/s
Trump does not “reject” “science’.
He does reject the erroneous notion of scientific orthodoxy that denies there are often multiple well-respected and well deserved scientific views on many different subjects.
“Scientific American” I noticed many years ago quit being a true “science” publication and instead became a politically correct publication promoting politically correct views on “scientific” matters.
They’ve been pushing climate fraud for decades. I stopped my subscription in the 90s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.