[Menehune56]

Another liberal pressure group weighs in.

[tet68]

Political “science” in action.

[Joe Brower]

SciAm veered off into the weeds of leftist groupthink decades ago. I haven’t read it in 25 years.

[Buckeye McFrog]

Anyone still want to argue that science hasn’t been fully politicized?

[chrisser]

Be woke, be irrelevant.

I used to read SA. Was a subscriber.

That was decades ago. Haven’t opened one since.

[NormsRevenge]

If I didn’t want to think better of them, I’d say we are witnessing a race to madness, even in the scientific realm.

[silverleaf]

So much for “science”
Gonna bet Trump’s tipping off the public to HCQ triple therapy has saved thousands who were able to get it

[edwinland]

Are they also going to oppose Governor Cuomo?

[nickcarraway]

Did they do a double blind crossover study?

[Stepan12]

The Piel family owned “Scientific American.” The wife of the Piel owner ran a Communist front group. I don’t know who owns “Scientific American” now, but it is still written as if the Piels still run it.

[goodnesswins]

And, we wonder about the medical field...

[Wuli]

Trump does not “reject” “science’.

He does reject the erroneous notion of scientific orthodoxy that denies there are often multiple well-respected and well deserved scientific views on many different subjects.

“Scientific American” I noticed many years ago quit being a true “science” publication and instead became a politically correct publication promoting politically correct views on “scientific” matters.

[ArcadeQuarters]

They’ve been pushing climate fraud for decades. I stopped my subscription in the 90s.

[2banana]

get woked...go broke

[cba123]

My Dad used to subscribe.

Lots, and lots of former subscribers here.

[Rastus]

Its editors said they felt “compelled” to do so because President Trump’s well-documented rejection of science, from climate change to the coronavirus, has cost tens of thousands of American lives.

This Yahoo cuck uses quotes for compelled, so the rest of the sentence is biased trash from his own feeble mind.

[beethovenfan]

I can remember when Scientific American was actually about science.

[doc maverick]

Scientific American is not being very scientific. I would say money is involved. Global warming is THEORY which is:

“ an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events. : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is NOT KNOWN OR PROVEN TO BE TRUE.”

A theory has to be proven to be scientific law.
Global warming is just a set of ideas used to advance an agenda.
IT IS NOT PROVEN FACT.

A scientist at OSU had a set of data suggesting global warming is NOT substantiated by the data he collected.
He was fired and silenced.

This UNPROVEN THEORY is also being used to control everyone!
The data that global warmers have used doctored data! This has been silenced also.
The demon-rats pushing this could not even explain where carbon dioxide comes from when questioned l!
LOL!

[Gay State Conservative]

The Editor-In-Chief clearly wants a job in the President LegsUpHigh Administration.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

It has been decades since SA has been about real science, just like it has been decades since National Geographic has been about exploration and not politics.
 

[HarleyD]

Neither “Scientific” or “American”