Posted on 08/23/2020 8:17:50 AM PDT by CMAC51
Michigan Primary: 846 Absentee Ballots Rejected 'Because the Voter was Dead' (not to mention the 1,111 who had moved)
Of course there is no evidence. You mail them out, mark them send them in and count them. You can’t find fraud so there is no fraud.
How many fraudulent ballots were cast from “legit” voters who didn’t ask for ballots?
But hey, it’s less than one in five fraudulent ballots!
</sarc>
Bet the fraud somehow favors demonrats
An 18.5% fraud rate could flip *Wyoming* to Plugs.
Listen carefully to how the media conflates the mail ballot to the absentee voting ballot. One favored by dems which is the state mails out ballots to everyone verses the one used by Trump which is to ask for an absentee ballot which requires you ask and then they furnish one. The media make it sound like the same which it is not. One sucker was saying the other evening on the fake news and I wished I could reach through the TV and choke the bastard.
Democrats believe their vote counts should be automatically inflated by at least 33% because so many of “their voters” won’t get up off their ***es and go vote.
They truly believe they should be compensated for this effect, which is why they don’t think vote fraud is any big deal. Of course if it benefited the other side, they’d be going crackers over it.
Hmmmmm.
FauXi says this was an uncontrolled study
and cannot be believed.
All must continue to Obey him, PeloXi and GateXi.
I have no problem with early voting in person. Mail voting by
residents who will be out of state on election day has to be
allowed but watched closely.
My preference for this election is early voting, in person over
a period of time, 10 - 14 days. People are out and about thus
they can visit selected voting sites to cast their ballot.
Left to operate in the dark the Democrats will push that number up to 20% if need be, these figures make it harder not easier for even the Roberts’ Court to side with them over us.
So, one out of every five was fraud - and that’s only what they detected?
The whole mail in ballot system in Oregon is fraudulent....ballot stuffing, ballot shredding, and you have to sign your name on the OUTSIDE ENVELOPE containing the envelope that contains your ballot. They know who you are BEFORE they even open the inside envelope that contains your ballot. The post office also knows who you are because your name is on the OUTSIDE ENVELOPE.
What could go wrong?
“ FauXi says this was an uncontrolled study
and cannot be believed.
All must continue to Obey him, PeloXi and GateXi.“
The above are deep staters that are CLOAKED IN DARKNESS
What needs to be done is have the fraudulent votes tallied. If it is not an organized scheme the tally should match the general trend of the state or area. If it is heavily weighted to one side, then we will know what is really occurring.
Let's try to get the math right. The article does not say how many absentee ballots were cast. What it does say is that of the 10,600 ballots that were rejected 846 were rejected because the voter was deceased.
So you can say that 846/10,600 or 7.9% of the rejected ballots were rejected due to the voter being deceased. Some of them are probably fraudulent, a few may have been due to the voter actually dying between the date they sent in the absentee ballot and the day of the election. But whatever the reason the data in the article shows only that 7.9% of the rejected ballots were possibly fraudulent.
And that ratio has nothing to do with the rate of those votes relative to the total number of votes in the election.
Fake news doesn't help anybody, there is enough of it in the liberal media. No need to create more of it.
It is not an 18.5% fraud rate. Unfortunately we've got Freepers who post fake news and who can't do elementary math either.
The whole state is a fraud...............
That’s absentee voting, which does need to be watched, but is not what the commies known as democrats are pushing for.
And early voting periods just give more time to the commies to bus their professional ‘voters’ around to different polling places and vote for names on the voter rolls that either represent dead people, animals, illegals or people who exist but never vote. That’s one of their popular ways to cheat.
One day for voting, indelible ink on a finger too, you vote after presenting valid id, and paper ballots only, no electronic voting with its attendant opportunities for vote fraud and election cheating the democrats do so well. And the bigger population centers have to announce their tallies first, going in order from largest to smallest, so the democrats in the large population centers don’t know how many votes to manufacture to steal an election.
A bar code could be placed on the ballot which when scanned records the selections and afterwards voters could go online and scan a copy of their barcode to be sure their vote was recorded correctly. No connection between their ID and the barcode. Just a thought.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.