It's almost like I brought up Robert E. Lee...
Posted on 08/22/2020 1:37:33 PM PDT by conservative98
The witch hunt is on! I'm not going to be bullied into being a political prisoner for my beliefs. I have fought hard for these freedoms and the SDNY is on a all out assault to take down every Trump insider from the 2016 election, that means Bannon. They will ruin innocent peoples lives in order to have a war trophy pinned to the wall just before elections.
I've obtained one the best super lawyers around who isn't afraid to fight back at the politically motivated assaults against me. This is where the line of freedom is drawn. If you allow the weaponized apparatus to win, we lose freedom. They will go after anyone for anything they want, anytime.
They wont ever investigate their friends like the Clinton Foundation. They've targeted Trump's inner circle- Flynn, stone, Manafort, Cohen and now Bannon. If it walks like duck, quack likes a duck, its a duck. We cant let the weaponized judicial system take anymore political prisoners.
FIGHT BACK!
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
Or that Trump also appointed his replacement, Audrey Strauss? Surely you were aware of that, weren’t you? And that she also reports to Barr?
Trump’s pick was blocked amid much protest from the fired SDNY honcho. Strauss is the fill in and had the full support of the corrupt Democrats at SDNY.
It's almost like I brought up Robert E. Lee...
This case will be easy to prove.
1. Did he and/or his wife take money from the shell corporation. Yes
2. Did he know the shell corporation was being used to launder the money from the Wall charity? Feds either have the goods via texts, paper trails etc or they dont. Sounds like his texts give it away.
3. Someone will rat the others out. My guess is that guy who ratted on his shylock will be one to seek a deal. Bannon ratting out lesser people will not be sufficient for the Feds. He would have to roll on someone like Mercer, Guo, or Trump
Game, set and match to lodi90, Doodle!
Gee, I thought we were in the court of internet opinion, Not a court of law.
It’s funny watching all these law and order so called conservatives demanding no one form An opinion until all the evidence is presented in court! They never have failed to form opinions without evidence before.
I guess if it’s one of their political cronies all of a sudden there is never enough guilty evidence to convict.
As you've seen with the Flynn persecution, the corrupt system will just do what it wants, the law be damned.
Otherwise, Rapin Bill Clinton would have done a stretch for perjury.
Since, at present, there is no evidence, that is a straw man argument.
Actually sworn testimony and physical evidence and documents presented to the Grand Jury is in fact evidence.
Yeah, she can’t find any War Against Northern Aggression threads to troll today...
And can indict any old ham sandwich...
Oh, you’ve read that evidence and heard the testimony? My apologies. Please provide a link to it.
LOL. Or Kris Kobach. Why these lefties have to infiltrate FR when they have a plethora of radical rags and sites they could go to is beyond me.
The indictment rather clearly states what evidence the Grand Jury found to be true. Read it.
Law and order goes both ways; there is a thing called malicious/abuse prosecution larper.
This is so much different than Flynn
It involves texts and transfers of money.
Forensics can prove this case.
For example, his lawyer might try to claim that he didn’t know the money from the shell corporation was being laundered from the Wall Foundation. I suspect there will be hard evidence to show he did know and that he actively participated in the coverup. I dont think they will need anyone to confess.
these were not criminal masterminds. We know this because they communicated their misdeeds through texts.
So you don’t have a link to it. And you didn’t immediately deny that you hadn’t heard or read it so, by your own standard, you’re lying. And, by your standard again, it’s rock solid incontrovertibly true that you’re lying.
People with a brain see that red flag.
Presumption of innocence applies in court.
It does not necessarily apply in the court of public opinion.
Most opinions humans make occur outside of courtrooms. We decide who is right and who is wrong every day without attorneys and judges presenting evidence.
Bannon et al will get their day in court. As more of the evidence comes out more people will form their own opinions.
You need some serious help.
Actually, better not to make ant declarations.
Thew rabid left will twist your words, the swamp prosecuters will find a way to use the statements against you
You’re the one who needs help ... getting loose from your own logic rope that I tied you up with.
But whimpering about it does make you look sympathetic. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.