[Okeydoker]

Gee, I thought we were in the court of internet opinion, Not a court of law.

It’s funny watching all these law and order so called conservatives demanding no one form An opinion until all the evidence is presented in court! They never have failed to form opinions without evidence before.

I guess if it’s one of their political cronies all of a sudden there is never enough guilty evidence to convict.

[TigersEye]

I guess if it’s one of their political cronies all of a sudden there is never enough guilty evidence to convict.

Since, at present, there is no evidence, that is a straw man argument.

[rollo tomasi]

Has the evidence been examined by a neutral party yet and established guilt? If not, he is still presumed innocent based on his plea until the side you are rooting for proves guilt of the charges put forth.

Law and order goes both ways; there is a thing called malicious/abuse prosecution larper.

[spacejunkie2001]

seriously, you’re a fraud. YOU’RE the one that was deeming them guilty; it wasn’t your opinion. You claim to be a legal expert that’s ‘seen this before’. Good God dude..go away.