Posted on 08/07/2020 8:40:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
The pornographication of America's culture prevents victims from thinking clearly. Sadly, behavior once labeled bizarre or self-destructive is now common.
Police say Michael Cooper of Germantown, Maryland, approached women on social media and dating apps under the pseudonym “Rebecca Lattimore.” Through online conversations, Cooper would “slowly coax them to send nude photos and videos,” according to a recent article in the Washington Post.
Following this, he’d disclose the truth, that he was “actually a dude,” and demand the women have sex with him or he would send their compromising media to pornography sites, family members of the women, friends, and co-workers. That’s just the beginning of this bizarre story. Ultimately, it’s sadly emblematic of an American culture that has normalized hyper-sexuality to the point that it is now ravaging our society.
When last week investigators in Montgomery County charged Cooper with “threatening to inflict emotional distress” to obtain sex, it was the third time they had charged him with that exact offense in less than two weeks. “He keeps doing the same thing,” prosecutor George Simms declared in Montgomery County District Court. Judge John Moffett ordered Cooper to remain in custody with no option for posting bond. “I’m going to hold him until we get to the bottom of the case and find out what’s going on,” the judge ordered. Cooper’s attorney suggested he “may need mental health treatment.”
It gets worse. Several of the targeted women were heterosexual. Two persuaded their boyfriends to intervene. One of those boyfriends agreed, confronting Cooper in a parking lot, pinning him to the ground and threatening: “Give me one reason why I shouldn’t mess you up.”
In response to the fact that his girlfriend had sent nude photos of herself to a stranger, the boyfriend acknowledged, “It happened. … It was what it was. But no one deserves to be exploited like that.” Only two weeks later, Cooper was confronted by a different boyfriend, who detained the 22-year-old extortionist until police arrived.
In one of the cases (there are at least four, according to authorities), the photos Cooper elicited from the women ended up on a porn website. According to detective Joshua Locke, Cooper targeted “smart, professional women he didn’t know.” One woman, a 29-year-old corporate sales trainer, started communicating over Instagram and Snapchat with “Rebecca Lattimore” on June 13. The very next day, as well as again two days later, the woman sent sexually explicit photos and videos of herself to Cooper’s Instagram and Snapchat accounts.
Obviously, Cooper is an odious criminal who should be punished. But such deviants have always existed in the nether regions of our society. Before the internet, they frequented the seedy parts of town near pornography shops and “adult” cinemas; they would walk around in trench coats and flash innocent folks passing by. Now, thanks to the anonymity of technology, they are more capable of fabricating identities.
Another bizarre and concerning thing about this episode is how the Post presents Cooper’s victims as ordinary, intelligent, and “professional.” It says something about our culture that heterosexual women — with boyfriends, no less — who get involved with female strangers on dating apps are labeled “ordinary.” It says something about our culture that women who send nude media of themselves to strangers — in at least one case, the day after the online “relationship” began — are supposedly “intelligent.”
It also appears our culture is so saturated in pornography that activities once considered rare, immoral, obscene, and stupid are now condoned, if not celebrated. “Fifty Shades of Grey” normalized bondage, domination, and sado-masochism. Television and movies bring all manner of once-obscure sexual fetishes into American homes. Smartphones make the most obscene pornography accessible to us anywhere; they’ve become, as columnist and scholar Chad Pecknold puts it, a “red-light district in everyone’s pocket.”
Whatever one thinks of the morality of pornography, the results of this cultural and sexual transformation have been horrendous. In the United States, between 5 to 8 percent of the adult population is either addicted to pornography or engages in problematic porn use. Almost one-third of males between ages 18 and 30 use it daily, and the average age of first exposure is 11 years old. One website recently featured an advertisement urging kids to use their site when their parents leave the house.
Pornography’s effects on the brain are similar to that of compulsive drug use. More than half of divorce proceedings cite an “obsessive interest” in pornography. Porn fosters physically aggressive forms of sexual behavior — one study showed that almost 90 percent of porn videos depict physical aggression.
It would be naive to think that the pornographication of our culture is not at play in the story of the creep Cooper and his female victims. The lust and sexual addiction it fosters leads people to do evil and stupid things.
Even the supposedly happy, wildly successful, and fabulously wealthy aren’t immune; just consider former Democrat Rep. Anthony Weiner, Charlie Sheen, and Tiger Woods. Or, consider the biblical examples of David’s affair with Bathsheba (resulting in the murder of one of the king’s most trusted soldiers) or King Herod’s decision to behead John the Baptist after Herod watched his daughter-in-law perform a seductive dance. Obsessive sexual behavior also seems intimately linked with murder and other evils.
“Lust is forever threatening to stifle virility as well as intelligence. Impatient to create, it can only contaminate in the germ the frail promise of humanity; it is probably at the very source, the primary cause of all human blemishes,” writes George Bernanos in his novel The Diary of a Country Priest. “Impurity does not destroy this knowledge, it slays our need of it. … You no longer wish to know yourself. … You no longer want to possess yourself.”
The pornographication of American culture incited Cooper’s exploitative behavior; it also deadened the ability of his victims to think clearly. We can conclude the Washington Post fails to acknowledge this because such behaviors — widely considered bizarre, foolish, and self-destructive only a generation ago — are now, sadly, so very common.
Casey Chalk is a columnist for The American Conservative, Crisis Magazine, and The New Oxford Review. He has a bachelors in history and masters in teaching from the University of Virginia, and masters in theology from Christendom College.
I have a nude pic of me but I was only about a week old at the time.
Meanwhile, antifa bombers and violent police attackers are let out the revolving courtroom door in minutes.
Really smart women (and men) wait until after “I do”
“Don’t know if you are joking or not.”
The sad fact is that by and large women seek bad boys to make babies and good boys to take care of them.
“Free Republic is social media.”
Free Republic is relatively anonymous and we don’t post naked pictures of ourselves here.
And we're all better off for it...
Another thing going on is for girls to offer nude pics to former classmates for money. My so say that happens every few weeks
actually...
“And we’re all better off for it...”
I’ll second that. I just cannot believe how many people with twitter accounts in their real names with pictures and everything just keep posting away.
split up and cash in don’t need dashes
Well, it isn’t so much a lack of smarts as a lack of wisdom that sees women attracted to men who are obviously no good.
A “Common Sense Quotient” counterpart to IQ that might have hypothetically been devised in some era when people couldn’t afford to be fools would be a savage affront to the nitwits (or either sex, never mind the extra special nitwits of the gender ID crowd) running amuck today.
Marshmallow or penguin?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.