That means the cops won't bother me when I fight back!?!?!?
Author complains that the term “imminent danger” is too open to interpretation. One bets he’s completely comfortable with such vague terms as “fair share (of taxes),” and “hate speech,” however. It’s all about whose agenda is serviced, and his agenda is obviously more riots.
After reading what the law was, I agree, it should be changed. Seven should be dropped to 3. That would make it the same as the number off people that defines gang assault.
Rioters who assault people, throw firebombs, set fire to cop cars, stores and buildings, need to be neutralized. That’s what needs to happen.
The laws don’t matter. What matters is the orders given to cops. Generally it is “Pretend to be keeping order. Never shoot a rioter, no matter what. Stand passively and let the rioters do whatever they want to do. Later, we’ll blame it all on Right Wing White Supremacists.”
This is total BS!
Have we forgotten that thousands of folk in Michigan, with assault rifles, marched to the court house protesting and demanding that Michigan open?
They did it without destruction, they did it without rioting and pillaging the city.
Rioting is NOT protesting.
Rioting is rioting and the laws are fine AS THEY STAND.
The glaring gall of the commie/Nazi/leftist propaganda machine is extraordinary. Maybe the soroznazi gangsters will accidentally burn down the washPost or nyTimes? If they do, it will be interesting to see their next Anti-law editorial
I wonder how many of these anti-riot laws were passed because the Klan was out of control and now they want to get rid of anti-riot laws to help the modern Democrat mobs, BLM and Antifa.
Translation: WaPo sides with Antifa/BLM/RevCom.
Does the author own property in a riot-prone area? I doubt it.
I sympathize with the Washington Post wanting to protect a right to riot. After all, being hateful and depraved enough to use fear and violence as political weapons is a time honored advantage that the Left has. It is their counter to individuals being reasonable which has been the time honored weapon of the Right.
The entire Washington Post staff, editorial board, and owner(s) should be arrested and sent to a facility in North Dakota so they can shuck corn for the collective.
Absolutely not a surprise that Wapo would support riots against the community.
The WaPo is desperate to destroy our way of life. They want poverty and oppression. It’s truly puzzling.
do not get fixated on the articles content.
the important thing to focus on is how the Washington Post is advocating the dismanteling of our country by terrorism.
That is what one responds to.
That is the important part of this article.
Bull crap! First, they shouldn't be throwing rocks or bottles. Also, I have yet to see a wholesale arrest of everyone when just one rock was thrown. You're really stretching here. Second, who made you the arbiter of what an "unjust arrest" is? To me, if you break the law, it's justified to arrest you. Third, what does "fall hardest" mean.
Exaggerate the circumstances = Media
Ignore circumstances = Media
Facts are not what the media knows how to deal with it’s all about the lefts agenda.
It’s obvious this guy speaks for the crazies and is one himself. We need to seriously move to bring back insane asylums. We used to commit the violent crazies who couldn’t/wouldn’t conform, who behved outside normal standards of civilized society. Now, all the insane misfits are running around free on the streets, prime Soros’ recruits to conduct anarchy, mayhem, and trash our society.
The cultural-racial atmosphere feels like its 1875 again.
Does this qualify as a riot?
Chicago police under attack defending Christopher Columbus statue
Ho Lee Phuk
https://twitter.com/i/status/1284290149606518784
https://twitter.com/i/status/1284287185508864006
let’s find out where this guy lives, go to his neighborhood and start a riot!!!