Derek Chauvin, 44, had 30 days from the date he received notice of the divorce petition to file an answer and counter-petition if he wanted to challenge any of his wife’s proposals. That expired Friday. He had not filed any papers as of late Monday, although it’s common for divorce attorneys to grant an extension without filing such a notice in the court system.
________________________________________
Maybe she will get everything she wants...Maybe Chauvin does not care about that at this time...He does not have a lawyer in the divorce case...
To: L.A.Justice
Maybe Chauvin does not care about that at this time... I'm sure he has other legal matters on his mind at the moment.
To: L.A.Justice
Could this be a strategy to protect personal assets from civil suits?
4 posted on
07/15/2020 8:06:49 AM PDT by
MNGal
To: L.A.Justice
Certainly he’s unlikely to be in need of housing in the next 7 lifetimes served consecutively.
5 posted on
07/15/2020 8:07:08 AM PDT by
babble-on
To: L.A.Justice
Maybe this is to preserve his assets for his wife and/or children in case he gets sued.
To: L.A.Justice
A fast divorce is a smart financial move.
If I was persecuted like the four cops are being I would give everything to my wife and divorce her on the spot. Otherwise it will be confiscated to settle the civil lawsuits that are sure to follow.
To: L.A.Justice
He is going to jail. He does not need a house. Floyds family is going to take everything from him. He should let her take all she can. He can’t retain any assets. He will be in jail.
8 posted on
07/15/2020 8:13:03 AM PDT by
poinq
To: L.A.Justice
Note to self: Don’t kneel on someone’s neck and much trouble will be avoided.
13 posted on
07/15/2020 8:17:48 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: L.A.Justice
The court can’t do a clawback on his assets if it determines he shed them just to protect his assets from seizure?
16 posted on
07/15/2020 8:22:08 AM PDT by
moovova
To: L.A.Justice
Likely protecting the families assets.
17 posted on
07/15/2020 8:29:00 AM PDT by
caww
To: L.A.Justice
Protect their assets from civil forfeiture?
25 posted on
07/15/2020 9:30:40 AM PDT by
BlackAdderess
(The GOP needs to pick another color. It is a matter of time before the Dems will want red back)
To: L.A.Justice
It’s possible the cop realized he didn’t have a chance, that the outcome of the trial was completely predictable, that his life is over, and to protect his wife he told her to get a divorce and ask for the property.
26 posted on
07/15/2020 9:32:40 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(BLM is a violent marxist movement designed to overthrow the US constitutional form of government.)
To: L.A.Justice
Maybe he is allowing her to have everything so that it can not be taken by St Floyd's family.
30 posted on
07/15/2020 10:34:02 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Leave it to me to be holdin' the matches when the fire truck shows up & there's nobody else to blame)
To: L.A.Justice
This is a device to protect these assets from the inevitable lawsuits.
34 posted on
07/15/2020 11:23:29 AM PDT by
Fido969
(In!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson