Posted on 06/08/2020 8:16:49 PM PDT by lasereye
According to award-winning journalist Adam Housley, “as many as 16-17” criminal referrals will be headed to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the Obama administration’s spying on the Trump campaign in 2016.
“Criminal referrals have already been sent to the Justice Department and the overall number may reach as many as 16-17 by the end of next week. Investigators are working on additional ones as we speak and some are targeting the Mueller probe and how [retired Gen. Michael Flynn was] investigated,” Housley tweeted.
Housley explained that the criminal referrals are coming from Congress “and are much more detailed than any before.”
“This is coming from people with direct knowledge of the ongoing investigations. These same sources say this targets agency folks and McCabe may be one. What’s interesting is to see how this will differ, if at all, from what [U.S. Attorney John] Durham is doing,” Housley added.
On Saturday, The Washington Examiner reported that House Intelligence Committee Republicans were preparing to send Obamagate criminal referrals to the DOJ. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) had sent eight referrals to Barr last spring, and he told Fox Business last week that House Republicans have enough evidence for “at least another five, possibly as many as 10” recommendations for prosecution as three U.S. attorneys review various aspects of the Russia investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
And how many charged, convicted, and jailed? None. And how many still have government jobs, clearances, and pensions? Most or all. Zip has been done and zip will be done. Sadly it is all talk.
...
Yawn.
Once upon a time journalists reported events that had really, truly, actually, factually already happened.
Could FReepers try & understand these “hasn’t happened yet, might not but maybe sometime soon we hope” stories just waste time & bandwidth?
Could we just stop posting them?
This isn’t journalism & serves no useful purpose
Yeah, they will give them to Barr, and then what?
I predict: Nothing.
Not necessarily. If the Justice Department believes they have enough evidence to charge a subject with a crime, they may request a preliminary hearing in front of a judge for a ruling on probable cause.
If their “information” filing is solid and presents convincing evidence that a crime has been committed, the judge will, in all likelihood, rule the state has satisfied the evidentiary burden necessary for “probably cause” to indict.
XLNT
You can get politicians to do what you want by rioting.
Is this a tic-toc, bombshell, or boom?
As long as Obama, Hillary , Comey, Strozk And Page are in the chain gang.
Ho
Hum.
15th story like this already.
Let me know what there’s INDICTMENTS. OK ?
It's much worse. You give to much credit via "Lucy holding the Football."
This time Lucy has blind folded Charlie, she's only telling him, that she's holding the football, when in reality she's not even on the field.
20 billion sealed indictments.
Trust Sessions!
They almost act as if something were going to come from all this posturing.
Step by step. Inch by inch. Slowly I turned...
Free beer tomorrow.
Republicans are NOT ‘law abiding’. Some conservatives are.
Epstein is murdered in his cell by the Deep State
Barr calls it a "Suicide" and fires two $14 an hour security guards
They will just act out their part and choose not to prosecute
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.