[jeffersondem]

“If I thought somebody was waiting for me that might be something I would do, pretend to run on the direction and then try to get the gun away and shoot them.”

So, “If I thought somebody was waiting for me” you would “try to get the gun away and shoot them.”

But not just waiting; you go on to say deadly force would be justified if you thought someone was attempting to follow you.

Now tell us more about the faulty thinking of the McMichael’s.

[RedStateRocker]

If someone was waiting for me, then the only assumption would be they intended to attack or kill me. How hard is that?

[RedStateRocker]

Deadly force would be completely justified if you tried to restrain me and I was neither on your property illegally or I had INITIATED an attack on you. You can’t pull a gun on someone first and then claim ‘self-defense’ if you shoot them in a tussle, at least not if any sane person is on the jury.
The only legal reason I could ever pull a gun on someone is if there were trespassing or if the INSTIGATED an altercation.