Deadly force would be completely justified if you tried to restrain me and I was neither on your property illegally or I had INITIATED an attack on you. You can’t pull a gun on someone first and then claim ‘self-defense’ if you shoot them in a tussle, at least not if any sane person is on the jury.
The only legal reason I could ever pull a gun on someone is if there were trespassing or if the INSTIGATED an altercation.
But moments ago you advocated death by gunfire for anyone you thought was attempting to follow you.
Let's look at your words: “Not a good strategy (get the gun away and shoot them), but completely justified, as would ANY action if someone were to attempt to follow or restrain me.”
I hate to be persistent, but it appears to me you have gotten very emotional about this incident - perhaps because of a concern someone will call you a racist.
To avoid that, you are willing to accept without question the narrative of the lame-stream media. And to abandon due process.