Posted on 04/29/2020 6:51:03 AM PDT by knighthawk
The Biden campaign reportedly is relying on a New York Times report in talking points being circulated to combat the explosive sexual assault allegation made by the candidate's former Senate staffer, Tara Reade.
BuzzFeed News reported on Tuesday that despite strong denials the campaign has issued to various media outlets, aides for former Vice President Joe Biden are taking Reade "seriously enough behind the scenes to coordinate messaging among other Democrats to try to cast the matter as one thats been thoroughly vetted and determined to be unfounded."
The "talking points" reportedly read, Biden believes that all women have the right to be heard and to have their claims thoroughly reviewed In this case, a thorough review by the New York Times has led to the truth: this incident did not happen.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Oh, well if the NY Times ‘investigated’ then I guess that settles it...
“The media supports me, so I must be innocent.”
Waiting for “journalist” Maggie Habermann to step up to the plate for her Party.
"The New York Times says I didn't, and that's gooed enough for me".
unfounded , discredited & debunked.
This is a classic Hillary tactic.
Smear the accusers.
Shes advising the Biden campaign.
Angling for VP.
McConnell should float the idea of having a Senate Investigation into this Matter
Whatever happened to "EVERY WOMAN MUST BE BELIEVED?
LOL! Gee, I wonder where the Fake News New York Times got its info in the first place.
Just a thought—what if Tara Reade is a DNC operative? What if she’s the “insurance policy” to get Slow Joe out of the race? What if the media denials and deflections are all part of the plan to make it look more realistic?
Not saying that the assault didn’t happen, but the event may have been kept aside until now to replace him on the ticket.
"The Democrat Party made a deal with President Xi of China to wreck the US economy with the coronavirus to make sure Trump wouldn't get elected."
I caught the start of the Harf-wit, Marie, defending Biden last night. She emphasized that Reade’s “story has changed” over the decades. This itself is spin, since the story never changed, only that her willingness to tell it to the media has changed.
Thus the spin from Harf-wit is that Reade is a liar. What it really means is that Harf is the liar. I suspect, though, that this will become the Swamp media defense based on the Democrat talking point orders.
FatAzzAbrams has already used slimes investigation
As an exoneration of GropinJoe
Still fellating for that Token VP job
So Biden is opting for the “sluts and nuts” defense (the Clinton playbook)
How soon before they tell everyone what happens when you drag a dollar bill through a trailer park?
Odd that not a single Democrat cared that Ford’s allegations against Kavanaugh were, at best, inconsistent and at worst the evidence was non-existent. They didn’t care that he testimony evolved while she was before the Senate committee. The members of the committee even went out and made up their own evidence. Vastily different way of handling sexual assault allegations.
Joe Biden + Bill Clinton = SAME
The nyt will gladly help him by burying the truth and promoting lies.
I’m sure they investigated it just as thoroughly as they investigated Biden’s ties to Burisma.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.