Replies

That would be interesting. How would she get her hands on such documents, and why would she need to ask for them if she already had them?

Perhaps a more likely scenario is that she does NOT have them, but knows they exist?

She has some, but those she has refer to documents that have not been handed over which under Brady must be. . . yet they claim these referred to documents just don’t exist. But if they’re referred to in extant, already produced documents, the they prima facie exist. So, hand them over and quit playing games! Each time Powell goes back to court she shakes more of these "non-existing" documents loose, which the prosecution they swears "that’s all there is,Your Honor, cross our lying hearts, there are no more!" But they still don’t include a lot of the already cited documents that she has in other produced docs, and the newly produced stuff always shows there’s even MORE they’re hiding! Then, other cases evidence show they have even more they haven’t released that was exculpatory to Flynn. . . and it’s nowhere in what they’ve produced! Ever!

Now the question arises "did the prosecution actually give the exculpatory evidence to Flynn’s former attorney’s, i.e., Eric Holder’s law firm, and was it buried for political reasons?" Now there are serious ethical questions for his former attorneys. Did they have it and not use it because their senior partner, Eric Holder, ordered them not to?