Posted on 02/17/2020 3:59:43 PM PST by Syncro
Harvard Law School professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz revealed in an interview on Sunday that he has proof that former Democrat President Barack Obama ordered the FBI to investigate someone after far-left billionaire George Soros asked for the investigation.
Dershowitzs remarks come after critics have attacked President Donald Trump for tweeting about matters related to the Department of Justice, which led to Attorney General William Barr publicly asking the president to stop last week.
There was a lot of White House control of the Justice Department during the Kennedy administration and I dont think we saw very many liberal professors arguing against that, Dershowitz told Breitbart News. I have some information as well about the Obama administration which will be disclosed in a lawsuit at some point, but Im not prepared to disclose it now about how President Obama personally asked the FBI to investigate somebody on behalf of George Soros, who was a close ally of his.
Weve seen this kind of White House influence on the Justice Department virtually in every Justice Department, Dershowitz continued. The difference this president is much more overt about it, he tweets about it. President Obama whispered to the Justice Department about it.
You said that George Soros asked Barack Obama to have his Justice Department investigate somebody? Breitbart News pressed.
Thats going to come out in a lawsuit in the near future, yeah, Dershowitz responded. I have in my possession the actual 302 form which documents this issue and it will at the right time come out, but Im not free to disclose it now because its a case thats not yet been filed.
Excerpt, read more at daily wire
(Excerpt) Read more at dailywire.com ...
Yea, the whole no standing thing was unbelievable. Apparently no one has standing......
[[[To Laura and Hannity; we already know all the stuff you tell us over and over again every day, so when you have a guest LET THEM TALK!]]]
Dobbs is the same. Extremely tedious.
Is loyalty to a country inherited or something that's freely given?
Hint, we have a pledge of allegiance.
Is the son of King George, born to an American mother, loyal to America? Perhaps, but the founders decided it was too great a risk for the highest office of the land. Citizen yes, natural born citizen no.
YEAH, CITIZENS OF THE US HAVE NO STANDING IN HAVING HONEST, CONSTITUTIONAL ELECTIONS.
THE CONSTITUTION DIDN’T CHANGE.
He says, angling for a book deal...
Let's leave the issue of royalty, with the possible complications of claims on the British throne, out of it for now.
Suppose a British general who becomes dissatisfied with the regime moves to America, marries an American woman and sires a son.
That son is raised as American from birth and never feels loyalty to any other nation.
I think the founders would relate and I see no reason they would want to prohibit that boy from becoming President one day.
Right, but constitution does not go into the voting booth and pull levers. It is the vast unwashed masses without photo ID who get to pick the president.
Would you believe a poor country like India has printed 800 Million voter ID’s WITH PHOTO, and no one can vote without one of those? I think the banana republics like Honduras have a more reliable voting process than we do here.
Dan Bongino talks about this Derschowitz claim at length on his podcast today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQtf5zUyMdg
Dershowitz was a pal of Epstein.
So quite frankly, I don’t trust him.
Synchro (I met you years ago) - are you kidding? Epsteins sex slave Virginia Roberts (now Giuffre) is an extremely believable eyewitness / victim. She has consistently said for years that she was given to Dershowitz and that he enjoyed it so much he came back at least 5x - in various Epstein properties and in the air.
Everyone trashes Prince Andrew but Dersh did it more and hes still in glory on tv news.
It started when she would be asked to service her boss in the office when Dersh was in there working for him. I guess Epstein COULDNT helps but notice the famed constitutional experts tongue lolling out. Come on. Just because you like some of their work doesnt mean they arent a pedo.
In both cases, the son born could be American or British. A natural born citizen can be no other.
A son born here of American parents can be nothing but American. No other country on the planet can call him a citizen at the time of his birth.
This is what makes him a natural born citizen as opposed to a citizen.
It is also why the Citizen at the time of the adoption of the constitution is in the text, not one of the founders was a natural born citizen.
Any country, including the US, can grant citizenship to whomever they want.
We could pas a law saying the next child Putin fathers is a US citizen at birth, and the child would be.
I’m going to go slow so there are no more misunderstandings that cause you to be a little rude.
“Synchro (I met you years ago) - are you kidding?”
No not at all. Is it all that unbelievable that some people (me for instance) aren’t aware of all the pedophiles associated with Epstein?
“Epsteins sex slave Virginia Roberts (now Giuffre) is an extremely believable eyewitness / victim. She has consistently said for years that she was given to Dershowitz and that he enjoyed it so much he came back at least 5x - in various Epstein properties and in the air.”
Underage sex slave?
Again I ask, can you provide links where this story is out there somewhere so I can read it from the source? Not that I don’t believe you, I just like to have sources.
“I guess Epstein COULDNT helps but notice the famed constitutional experts tongue lolling out”
I won’t ask you for a source for that ‘lolling out’-must be a inside pedo term- or that is just the way you like to describe it.
“Come on. Just because you like some of their work doesnt mean they arent a pedo”
Sorry for getting you so emotionally keyed up that you think it’s necessary to patronize me like that.
Though we met in the past, it doesn’t seem you know me very well. Heck you don’t even know how to spell my handle...
Thanks for weighing in.
You are not very kind. I was on the go and my phone spelled your name that way. Nothing I said should have caused you to be hostile. If this is some kind of argument that you think Dershowitz is not a man who would cheat on his wife multiple times in multiple places with a 16-17 year old girl was was not at liberty to say no, then we will agree to disagree because I believe he did exactly that.
I spelled Giuffres name correctly so you could look it up. I dont have time to find links. Its easily researched.
Shocked at your level of antagonism. Sorry if anything I said on the go made you think all these things, like my supposed patronizing. Unintentional. I was once in a similar situation as Virginia so I understand and believe her. Moreso since she has spoken out so much more since last year.
Many, many people (maybe most FReepers?) assume Dershowitz is a great guy because he is defending Trump. Abusing underaged girls and defending Trump are not mutually exclusive activities. Its not patronizing to see with my own eyes how many think so highly of him. I, personally, can not.
Biden news I didnt hear about?
Didn’t read your whole post.
After a couple of false premises that was enough for me.
Sorry if I offended you, I was just reacting to your passive aggressiveness.
Which btw was subtle hostile in fact.
Carry on.
Soros, Obama and Hillary - the axis of evil
or asses of evil
“I dont have time to find links”
It’s common practice when posting something as important as what you posted, accusations etc, to back up comments with links to stories that prove what you post.
I did a bit of searching and didn’t find what you posted.
I like to deal in facts, and do NOT judge someone as wonderful because they support Trump.
Nor do I judge them as horrible without proven facts .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.