Goes down easy with Koolaid
Is Newsweek already speaking of the Sanders campaign in the past tense?
Establishment Dims coming out with the sharp blades now....Can’t allow Sanders to win nomination UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!
long, complicated explanation" should be "tortured and non-credible explanation". But when the press wants to bury things they claim that 'even though it looks real bad, there's really a long and complicated explanation for why it's not but we won't bore you with it; move along'.
I’m not sure about this author. Seems like (to be a conspiracy theorist he despises lol) it’s written to suppress Sanders voters.
He is also missing a lot of important points. For example, does anyone remember when the DNC locked Bernie out of their computer database for several days? I don’t remember the specific details but I believed he filed suit. And surely he must be aware of the scheme Hillary employed to funnel state and national party donations directly to her campaign - to get around the campaign donation limits of $2700 per person she had her donors pledge money to the various state/national party. In turn, because there is no limit on party donations to a candidate, they sent 90%+ of it back to her by design and agreement. Many state party representatives complained this left them starved of funds.
And for someone who is quite opinionated, he writes “if the Stein voters in Michigan voted for Hillary she *may* have won the state”. May have? It took me 10 seconds to look it up. She would have. Buy by the same measure, if all the Libertarian votes went to Trump he would have beaten her by an even bigger margin.
I actually enjoyed that article. He’s a good spokesperson for his side (despite the vulgarities). And I’m pretty used to the fact that for the media, their side = the DNC.