Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2020 2:23:16 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: MeganC

Cali Ping!


27 posted on 01/31/2020 2:41:49 PM PST by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

So they are only going to give the list to their AntiFA (anti-first-amendment) thug “friends”?


28 posted on 01/31/2020 2:41:49 PM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

If they don’t intend to release the list then why do they want it?


29 posted on 01/31/2020 2:44:42 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

There was a California State Supreme Court ruling decades ago that said the permitting agencies had to release this information in order that the public can be assured the ‘discretionary system’ used by the local LEO’s were not being given exclusively to rich, well connected, campaign donors or that no racial biases were deployed in the issuance etc. In CA permits are issued by the county sheriff or the city police (but the police can refuse to issue any permits and then it falls on the sheriff).

But it is not shall issue it is may issue. The rural county sheriffs are mostly ‘shall issue’ in practice. The red counties basically only give them to the inner sanctum - judges, donors, wealthy.

So if you live in Mendicino County you can get a CCW permit, then drive into San Fran and carry legally, while San Fran residents can’t do the same. The permit issued in one county is good throughout the state. It’s a weird old system created back in the racist days when the politicians figured a discretionary system would allow them to give permits to white men and deny them to Blacks and Hispanics.


30 posted on 01/31/2020 2:44:51 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

There was a California State Supreme Court ruling decades ago that said the permitting agencies had to release this information in order that the public can be assured the ‘discretionary system’ used by the local LEO’s were not being given exclusively to rich, well connected, campaign donors or that no racial biases were deployed in the issuance etc. In CA permits are issued by the county sheriff or the city police (but the police can refuse to issue any permits and then it falls on the sheriff).

But it is not shall issue it is may issue. The rural county sheriffs are mostly ‘shall issue’ in practice. The red counties basically only give them to the inner sanctum - judges, donors, wealthy.

So if you live in Mendicino County you can get a CCW permit, then drive into San Fran and carry legally, while San Fran residents can’t do the same. The permit issued in one county is good throughout the state. It’s a weird old system created back in the racist days when the politicians figured a discretionary system would allow them to give permits to white men and deny them to Blacks and Hispanics.


31 posted on 01/31/2020 2:44:52 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
...the Office of County Counsel advised him that he is legally obligated to turn over the information.

Office of County Counsel.

32 posted on 01/31/2020 2:44:53 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Free men don’t ask permission. The 2nd Amendment is your permit, if you choose to be an actual American.


33 posted on 01/31/2020 2:45:06 PM PST by dware (Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Reason 10,348 that my wife and I packed up the kids and left our home state more than 10 years ago. Quit our jobs, sold our home, and moved to the Tampa Bay area.
We miss the geography (and our family and friends). Florida is beautiful at the coasts but away from the coasts it’s just flat and featureless.
But, we’d do it again in a heartbeat to escape the radical leftists ruining that beautiful state.


34 posted on 01/31/2020 2:46:05 PM PST by ocrp1982 (ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

3 more SCOTUS by the end of 2024


37 posted on 01/31/2020 2:47:34 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
Massive class action on deck!
38 posted on 01/31/2020 2:47:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne (It's a New Year, and time to up our FR Monthlies by 5-10%. You'll <hardly miss it and it will help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Time to Dox every single employee of the San Francisco Chronicle and start sending them letters........


40 posted on 01/31/2020 2:48:07 PM PST by Hot Tabasco (I want an impeachment pen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

““It is a journalist’s job to investigate trends, and we do not intend on publishing personal information of private citizens,” Cooper said.......”

So why does the “journalist” need names for a trend?


41 posted on 01/31/2020 2:48:17 PM PST by rockinqsranch ("Democratic" party sold out to the ICP. It is now the Communist Party USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Maybe the media wants to know who in their crazed employ is packing.


42 posted on 01/31/2020 2:51:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!! The UN is so olf and dated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
San Francisco Chronicle Editor in Chief Audrey Cooper told CBS13 that they have no intention of releasing license holder’s names or other private information. She added that she felt “deeply disturbed” that the sheriff would want to tell law-abiding citizens that the media have their information. “I am deeply disturbed by how some sheriffs have handled a routine request for public information from a respected and established news outlet. As a result, they have put our journalists in personal danger for their own political gain,” Cooper stated.

Well, suck it up, buttercup . . .

45 posted on 01/31/2020 2:54:58 PM PST by Charlemagne on the Fox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Keep voting democrat Cali.


46 posted on 01/31/2020 2:56:27 PM PST by Pajamajan ( Pray for our nation. Thank the Lord for everything you have. Don't wait do it today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

well if they have no intention of releasing names or personal information, why do they want the list? And the media is ‘deeply disturbed ‘that “the sheriff” would notify the public that the media is demanding personal information? ha! Sing it from the rooftops Sheriff. SFC are a bunch of commies anyway.


48 posted on 01/31/2020 3:02:18 PM PST by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

What business is it of the newspaper who has gun licenses? That’s the danger in getting on any registry.


50 posted on 01/31/2020 3:08:30 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

How about a freedom of information request for an equal amount of information on all people in that area who DON’T have concealed carry permits???

Only seems fair to me.


51 posted on 01/31/2020 3:11:08 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (January 20, 2017, High Noon. The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

If it’s a “Concealed Carry” license, should the name of the holder also be “Concealed”?


53 posted on 01/31/2020 3:19:49 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

No right to privacy. No expectation of basic decency in California. Got it.

Enemy territory until taken back. It operates as a foreign country so it should be treated that way.

People in CA don’t like to leave the state because they know how hated California is. Not its people so much as its government and ideology.


54 posted on 01/31/2020 3:23:30 PM PST by Boomer ('Democrat' is now synonymous with 'corrupt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson